We have thousands of human-written stories, discussions, interviews and reviews from today through the past 20+ years. Find them here:

V.com weekend vote: The worst possible punishment would be listening to 20 hours of...
October 10, 2008 at 9:28 PM
This week's news brings us inspiration for our weekly vote, a hypothetical situation:
You've been busted for busking. The judge has sentenced you to 20 hours of aural torture for your crime: polluting the airways with your noise. Which would be the worst possible punishment?
Posted on October 10, 2008 at 9:33 PM
Posted on October 10, 2008 at 9:36 PM
Posted on October 10, 2008 at 9:44 PM
Posted on October 10, 2008 at 10:11 PM
Posted on October 10, 2008 at 11:08 PM
Posted on October 10, 2008 at 11:32 PM
Too bad you didnt put hannah montana or make it 2 options. If so I would have also voted for ashley tisdale. But I voted wiggles because if I had to listen to those wierdos for like 20 hours I would probably shoot myself in the face:) I cant stand them lol.
Posted on October 10, 2008 at 11:37 PM
On another note, the converse of what offends others may be seen, as I had something like that happen to me back in the ‘80s. I was at home with a group of friends. The police came to my door and politely asked me to turn down my stereo system, which they thought, was at a comfortable level. It seems the neighbor next door, whom I hardly knew, believed that my guests (and I) were holding a Nazi Youth Rally or something of that nature. The police were perplexed and I was stunned. The pieces we were listening to were classical music and international world music. The tune that the neighbor cited as a fear that nazis were camped next door was Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy” from the 9th Symphony. Stranger things have happened.
Posted on October 10, 2008 at 11:47 PM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 12:02 AM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 12:05 AM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 12:15 AM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 12:33 AM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 12:50 AM
I think we should do more polls like this! They're fun:)
Now that I look again, I dont like Kenny G either...
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 12:52 AM
Shall we go onto other celeberties? Oprah, Ryan Seacrest (Gotta love Simon tho, he's just like me!), um Dr.Phil.. No comment about him, oh and i cant stand those videos that Miley Cyrus and that chick do on youtube..So annoying.
Well, I think I'm done being negative, well for the moment that is:)
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 1:49 AM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 2:23 AM
I also take responsibility for pressuring Laurie to include Air Supply on the list. Though, in retrospect, I wish I'd lobbied for Tears for Fears. :-p
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 4:46 AM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 5:04 AM
When I first read the question about what I'd least like to listen to, my reaction was "good music played badly." I think of the times I've jumped up to switch radio stations because I couldn't bear to hear one of my favorite pieces abused. Restaurants sometimes have live music that I can't stand, especially strolling violinists who are technically correct but artistically awful and accordion players in German restaurants.
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 7:22 AM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 7:57 AM
There more truely excretable / excruciating music out there, surely!
Not that I was ever a great fan of air supply but then I hated Rod Stewart and loved Dolly Parton.
Miley Cyrus, Alanis Morriset, Celine Dion, Sarah Brightman, andre Rieu, every boy band ever put through the voice-o-matic 2000 (that would be all of them).
That would be a compilation album to cry to.
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 10:49 AM
peepeeepeeppeeeppeooopooopooopoopopopopopooeepepepepepehiphiphiphiphiphiphhiph
AAAAaaaaaaaaaagggggggggggggghhhhhhhh
gc
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 1:16 PM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 1:18 PM
Since "aural torture" was not limited to musical endeavors, I can think of several radio talk show hosts that would be pretty disheartening after 10 minutes, let alone 20 hours.
But the worst noise ever has GOT to be two pieces of Styrofoam rubbing together, making that ghastly squeaking sound. Bleh. (Cringe)
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 2:10 PM
20 hours of Dan Fogelberg
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 6:18 PM
- Rap
- Yawnee
- Country music lyrics ("If you don't go away and leave me alone, I'll find someone who will")
- The Three Tenors or The Three anything; enough already
- String performances of anything Baroque style on period instruments. I know it's politico-musically incorrect to not appreciate how authentically accurate it is, but it really does grate on my nerves. I like the harpsichord, however.
- Interviews with contemporary composers. They all sound like they're talking about building a bookcase for their den rather than writing an inspiring piece of music.
Sandy
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 7:15 PM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 7:29 PM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 7:47 PM
As for what would be worst, I don't know who half the choices are, and don't know what the other half sound like...
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 8:08 PM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 10:22 PM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 11:11 PM
I agree you don't want removal of all sound. I once spent less than a minute in an anechoic chamber and that was all the time I could stand. I could hear tinnitus I didn't know I had, and I could hear my heart beating and blood going through my veins. The silence was deafening, as they say:) I had to get out of there. It was normally used to measure the loudness of machines, by a company that made industrial machines.
This poll inspired me to search youtube for my most hated music. I found that it really was all good, in some context. Sandy, you've just got to meet it halfway.
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM
Posted on October 11, 2008 at 11:40 PM
Keep smiling.
Sandy
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 12:27 AM
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 12:39 AM
In their youthfuller days, Wiggles were more film noir .
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 1:36 AM
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 3:12 AM
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 3:17 AM
I only withstood about 5 seconds of the Wiggles.
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 4:28 AM
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 6:33 AM
was too obscure. I knew who I meant :)
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 7:35 AM
a composition centred around the Nokia ringtone.
To the torture list I would also add jungle music (except drum and bass), European dance/trance/house/garage, Bangra and Reggaeton.
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 12:09 PM
http://www.amazon.com/Polish-Lullaby-Star/dp/B000V9FZIC
Okay, I admit I've seen them in concert, and they really give their all to the kids when they are performing.
Their wikipedia entry is also quite interesting: A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wiggles"> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wiggles
Among other things, it says that they were motivated to use early childhood educational concepts to create high-quality children's music, and the band started as a school project.
They have outreach programs for special needs kids and at Sydney Children's Hospital.
They've made so many songs that they are bound to have some bad ones, but I'm not sure what they've done to bring on such scorn from this group.
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 2:51 PM
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 6:22 PM
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 7:33 PM
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 10:23 PM
I have just found the perfect word that I can use to describe my unique and often long winded, style of writing: SNARKY. I have never heard a word like that before. I looked it up and found the meaning for others just in case they don't know what it means:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Snarky
I am rather new to the "Internet Protocol Book of Rules and Regulations", that changes every second.
I have coined a Internet term myself;
"Bluggering"
1. To rant and rave in an unscientific manner, opinionated references that usually attempts to prove and unprovable point.
2. A useless discussion that only deals in trivial matters.
You wont find the word in any dictionary, but you will find the definition all over the internet.....
But on another note, I have to agree with Michael's statement. It makes me proud to know that someone considered that point within a certain number of posts, which were many. Is there a particular mathematical internet law saying that that will happen within a posting of threads?
Posted on October 12, 2008 at 11:30 PM
i've gotten pretty good at tuning meaningless pop crap out, but i don't think i could handle that level of dissonance and outright ugliness for so long.
(sorry if any of you actually like carter's stuff....)
Posted on October 13, 2008 at 3:21 AM
Posted on October 13, 2008 at 5:10 AM
Posted on October 13, 2008 at 5:01 PM
Posted on October 13, 2008 at 7:40 PM
Posted on October 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM
(btw Graham - you made me laugh SO HARD with that spelled out description of Zamphir. I'm still chuckling about it now!)
This entry has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.











