We have thousands of human-written stories, discussions, interviews and reviews from today through the past 20+ years. Find them here:
Time for Three Violinists Denied on U.S. Airways Flight
Written by Laurie Niles
Published: May 27, 2014 at 3:08 AM [UTC]
On Monday violinists Zach de Pue and Nick Kendall of Time for Three were left alone on the tarmac at Charlotte Douglas International Airport after the captain and crew of U.S. Airways flight No. 4799 informed them that their violins were not allowed on the flight.

Both violinists are members of Time for Three, and they were on their way to meet up with their bandmate, bassist Ranaan Meyer in Fayetteville, Arkansas, to play for the Artosphere Arts and Nature Festival. In frustration, they made this video:
By about 7 p.m. they were on their way on another flight, according to their Twitter feed. For the other flight, they said that they were "greeted by agent. He told us violins had to be plane checked. I told him the FAA stipulates rules that say otherwise. The agent then changed his tune, and told us we need to gate check our roller briefcases."
It would appear that denying them on the first flight was against FAA policies. The FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act of 2012, approved by the U.S. Congress in February of that year, in Section 713, "requires an air carrier to permit an air passenger to carry a violin, guitar, or other musical instrument on a passenger aircraft without charge if it can be stowed safely in a suitable baggage compartment in the aircraft or under a passenger seat."
How can one prevent this from happening? Here is what I recommend: If you are concerned about traveling with your violin in the U.S., you might want to copy the bill and put it in the pocket of your fiddle case. Here it is for you to copy. You also might want to highlight Section 713.
* * *
Related stories:
V.com weekend vote: Have you ever had trouble, flying with your violin?
Airplane & violins: which case fits?
Tweet
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 6:51 AM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 8:12 AM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 11:19 AM
I'm so glad you guys got it on film. Well done!
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 11:46 AM
Or we can simply ask everyone waiting for the flight at the gate if they care if we carry a violin on board. Probably no one will say no.
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 11:57 AM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 12:39 PM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 1:22 PM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 2:27 PM
Except I notice at the bottom of that that the law doesn't go into effect until the Dept of Transportion issues regulations, which it has to do within two years of the enactment of the law, which I think have passed. Searching the Code of Federal Regulations site (which I'm kind of confused by), I cannot find the regulations. Is this rule in legal limbo?
The way it works is flight crew are bound to the regulations in their manuals. The manual is created by the airline and based upon the law. What most people do not know is that bills passed by Congress and signed by the President are not the same thing as the law! The bill text is at: Http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/49/41724 Now I quote: "(b) Regulations. — Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall issue final regulations to carry out subsection (a)." Well guess what? The Secretary of transportation never created those regulations. The federal aviation regulations (FAR) governing carry on baggage is FAR 135.87 and FAR 121.589. As of today, May 27, 2014, there is still no mention of musical instruments, as the law required by February 14, 2014, exactly 2 years after Obama signed the hill into law. Airlines base their manuals on the FARs and so no amount of printing and waving a piece of paper will sway an airline to do anything. They still have the legal right to refuse any musical instrument from boarding if they feel like it. The ONLY thing you can do is contact your musician's union national legislative lobbyist and offer help in their efforts to push the Secretary to make the law into a regulation. Last I heard, they asked for a mere $500,000 in the budget to do a cost/benefit analysis in order to implement the regulation. This of course d denied because the Republicans in Congress blocked any budget from passing containing the language, and Democrats blocked any Republican alternative budget (none of which contained that language). We are in legal limbo: the law was passed, but it does not actually exist in the real world. Welcome to the convoluted world of politics :).
2) If your favorite case is bigger than it needs to be, consider getting a smaller case for when you fly. 3) Even people who don't have much respect for artists seem to have a respect for fragile antiques. Consider making it clear that is what you are traveling with, and if you want to through in a copy of your instrument's paperwork, it might cut even more ice than that as-yet-unimplemented piece of legislation. Most people don't have a clue that your instrument is worth an order of magnitude more than a laptop. 4) All of this is safer and more honorable than pretending you have a panic disorder and need to board at pre-boarding, but I do know people who make that work for them, too, and nobody has ever asked them what their special need is.
Well, I'm pretty sure that those things are precisely what make it into a law. However, putting that law into effect by issuing the required (and overdue) regulations, and enforcing that law, is another matter" '(b) Regulations. — Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall issue final regulations to carry out subsection (a).' Well guess what? The Secretary of transportation never created those regulations." In my opinion, that doesn't mean that it's not the law; it means that the Secretary of Transportation is in violation of the law, and theoretically, could be sued to issue those regulations as the law stipulates. Ironically, that also puts Congress in the position of violating the language of the law which they, with the president, have already passed. We are indeed in legal limbo, but I would say rather that the law indeed exists, but that the government is in violation of its own law. But I do understand that the airlines go by the currently-issued regulations, which in this case, are out of date. However, I suspect that the airlines could - and in my opinion should - comply with the new law without violating any of the current Federal regulations, so I'm not letting them off the hook. Brendan Doyle
Once upon a time we used to do this on a regular basis. Then came the day when a dress was damaged by one of the screws in the closet, and the woman sued the airline. As a result, another memo goes out, disallowing us the ability to be nice. I hate it, and sympathize with musicians & everyone else with precious cargo. MOST aircrew will do their best to help, but there are a few out there having a bad day. IF YOU ARE A MUSICIAN, OR KNOW A MUSICIAN, WHO FLIES WITH HIS OR HER MUSICAL INSTRUMENT(S), THIS PAGE IS FOR YOU! PLEASE SHARE THIS LINK http://bit.ly/bu0Rqe & YOUR EXPERIENCES!
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 2:35 PM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 3:35 PM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 4:31 PM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 4:49 PM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 5:32 PM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 6:16 PM
I fly with them a huge amount and no-one has ever even blinked at my violin. It would be sad if we all started a "US Air is evil" campaign on this one experience. I know lots of people have probably had trouble but lots of people also haven't (last flight I saw other passengers had at least a uke and a guitar also in the cabin with my violin).
Ellie
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 6:37 PM
Posted on May 27, 2014 at 11:08 PM
Posted on May 28, 2014 at 12:20 AM
Posted on May 28, 2014 at 3:20 AM
Rick Faris
Posted on May 28, 2014 at 4:55 AM
Posted on May 28, 2014 at 5:10 AM
Posted on May 28, 2014 at 5:41 AM
Posted on May 28, 2014 at 5:45 AM
"Now I quote:
"Last I heard, they asked for a mere $500,000 in the budget to do a cost/benefit analysis in order to implement the regulation. This of course d denied because the Republicans in Congress blocked any budget from passing containing the language, and Democrats blocked any Republican alternative budget (none of which contained that language)."
"We are in legal limbo: the law was passed, but it does not actually exist in the real world."
Posted on May 28, 2014 at 6:02 AM
Posted on May 28, 2014 at 6:41 AM
Posted on May 28, 2014 at 2:13 PM
Posted on May 28, 2014 at 6:42 PM
Posted on May 29, 2014 at 1:15 AM
Posted on May 29, 2014 at 4:28 AM
Posted on May 29, 2014 at 6:41 AM
Posted on May 29, 2014 at 2:09 PM
From Lindsay Shipps:
There's quite a lot of info out there if you have time to read it (people are busy and I never know how much to provide).
Essentially: Regional airlines operate more than 50 percent of the nation’s commercial schedule with more than 13,000 regional airline flights every day. Why does this matter? Because each particular regional airline does not necessarily adhere to the same policies as mainline airlines, read: Delta, Lufthansa, USAir, United, etc. Often the regional airline will be functioning as the forementioned airlines (or another I did not mention due to space limitations).
The following is excerpted from the following document http://faculty.weatherhead.case.edu/forbes/book_chapter_oct06.pdf:
"In the United States, regional airlines operate short- and medium-haul scheduled airline service, often connecting smaller communities with larger cities. Almost all regional airlines operate under codeshare agreements with one or more major carriers. Under these agreements, the regional operates flights on behalf of the major carrier, who markets and tickets these flights under its own two-letter flight designator code. Typically, no tickets are sold under the regional’s own code. In addition to using the major’s code, the regional’s flights also share the major’s brand.
"For example, the regional’s planes are painted in the major’s color schemes, the regional’s flight attendants [may] wear the uniforms of the major, passengers traveling on the regional earn the major’s frequent flyer points, and the regional [may[ use the logos, trademarks and even the name of the major (for example, regional airline Comair operates for Delta under the name Delta Connection). To facilitate passenger connections between the regional and the major, the schedules of the regional and its partner are coordinated, and often the regional carrier’s schedule is dictated by the major carrier. Check-in and baggage handling are also coordinated so that passengers need only check-in and check their luggage once, at the start of their trip. "
What does this mean for instrumentalists? It means you have to hold your own. It means you know the policy and if questioned, gently remind TSA/airline/airport staff that you're able to carry on your instrument (even if you have to buy a ticket for your 'cello). AND: It means that ALL airlines, regional or mainline, must adhere to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Sec. 401 re: Musical Instruments) but that the airline industry is typically granted exceptional leeway in the name of all-hallowed "safety." If the crew (Captain, First Officer, Flight Attendant, Gate Agent or otherwise) determines that your instrument is a hazard or impediment to safety, you're SOL.
So my best advice is to avoid the situation in the first place. If possible, try to get on the aircraft first. Then, if there's not a lot of overhead room, ask the pax (passengers) around you to help you out a la: "Ma'am, may I move your item a bit so I could fit my antique/family heirloom/Strad/great-grandmother's violin in the overhead bin? It's real special to me and I'd appreciate it." blah blah blah.
Basically don't give the Flight Attendant (FA) a reason to get all up in your business. If there's absolutely no room, gather up your wits and ask the FA if there's any room at all in the crew baggage area (it's forward near the cockpit in CRJs). If after that, you've given up and you reluctantly trudge off the plane (as I would if I were couriering instruments), go immediately to the gate agent and ask him/her to book you on the next flight which is probably the same (regional) airline and the same kind of aircraft, as Zachary DePue and Time for Three found out this past weekend. If you have any more questions please don't hesitate to let me know. Best, -Lindsay Shipps
Posted on May 29, 2014 at 6:19 PM
The important point is that, even after the FAA issues its new rules to implement the new law, if all of the overhead bins are full by the time you try to place your case in a bin, you are going to have to check your case unless (1)another passenger offers to check an already stowed item
(2) a crew member agrees to place your case in a secure place (3)there is an empty seat in which you can secure your case.
The closer you are to the beginning of the boarding line, the better chance you have of finding space in the overheads.
Also, another problem to be aware of: if you place your case in an empty overhead bin, be sure to place your case in the end of the bin closest to the cockpit. If your case is in the tail end of an otherwise empty bin, when the pilot puts on the brakes after landing, your case will slide very quickly to the opposite end of the bin.
Very
Quickly
My limited experience with Southwest is the gate attendants
couldn't care less if you have a violin case. I have seen many guitars board Southwest flights (but I have no idea if one or more had to be checked).
I have seen an Internet photo of a guitar that had to be checked. I don't recall whether it was repairable.
Posted on May 29, 2014 at 7:13 PM
Posted on May 29, 2014 at 9:57 PM
Please note USAirways carry-on bags info...http://www.usairways.com/en-US/traveltools/baggage/baggagepolicies.html
Posted on May 30, 2014 at 4:57 AM
Posted on June 1, 2014 at 1:30 AM
This entry has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.










