We have thousands of human-written stories, discussions, interviews and reviews from today through the past 20+ years. Find them here:

Search the site Search

Greetings,
actually there are disadvantages to having both very long or short fingers. The more important factor is the width across the hand. Look at Kogans for example. His awesome technique is rooted in that phenomenal breadth although his fingers are in no way extreme.
The great English violinist Hugh Bean once remarked about Heifetz that one of the vital factors in his technique was how completely ordinary his hands were. Nothing extreme at all.
Cheers,
Buri
I was going to say that finger-length, as for beauty, are in the eye of the beholder. A tall person might think their fingers are short - but they would be as long as, well, an Aye-aye. And vice-versa of course. Thus, it would be interesting to actually measure finger length.

I say 'was' because Buri changed the game twice: hand width (see also Perlman) being key and then our acme-player himself has ordinary hands. Say-it-ain't-so - he MUST have had some superhuman physical advantage..

1, 2, & 3 = Long :-)

4 = Short :-(

I won't say I have short fingers, but I have short arms.

I voted Medium, although I'm kind of in between medium and long. Certainly not as long as Waarts' though!

My fingers are weird. They are bent at the joints. It has never significantly affected my playing, but it's kind of funny looking.

I have a very short pinky, which causes me to have trouble playing fourth finger notes.??
I agree with Stephen and Elise. Hand width is more important than finger length on its own. I have fingers of very average length, but fairly wide. However, my hand is what is known as "square" - the width is equal to the length. Just as important is flexibility, which derives from relaxation. As a result, I can reach the G in alt on the Eing at literally the very end of the fingerboard comfortably with my 3rd finger without unseemly arm contortions, although my fourth finger (pinky) is really too short for the job. That G in alt came at the end of a symphonic tone poem by a local composer which we performed a couple of weeks ago.
I selected medium and that is probably correct. My problem is my fingers a large, or I would say almost fat. My teacher always tells me that "well it doesn't hurt Perlman but you need to be aware of them".

This is most noticeable on my daily scale exercises. My rhythm / bowing set uses a three octave scale and I try to leave the fingers down.

I notices mainly that when I lift the pinky I have to slide the third up a little to be in tune, so I am obviously moving it out of the way when I place the pinky. Third and second also have this issue higher up the fingerboard.

Wonder how Paganini might have responded?
LOL There should be a separate category: short, medium, long, paganini!!!

So how would you define long fingers? I can easily reach a tenth and more if I try, and I had no trouble with the ascending tenth scale on the bruch concerto. So does that mean I have long fingers?

I have a friend who is a virtuoso at the highest level. He has exceptionally long fingers and no doubt this is an advantage but he says that it isn't without its problems.

He surmounts them quite well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7UW2CJM3wA

My teacher told me it wasn't the length of the fingers that was important but rather the width of the hand. Think of all the past excellent-playing short and wide eastern European violinists.
Violinron
Corwin, those Illenyis are such a musical and beautiful family, all of them! Thanks for sharing that.
I remember my surprise when a friend's violin teacher held up her left hand and I saw how short her pinky is. It doesn't seem to slow her down any, though.

As for me, I'm glad I have long fingers; it makes those octaves on my viola much easier.