We have thousands of human-written stories, discussions, interviews and reviews from today through the past 20+ years. Find them here:

mm = 109-113
April 17, 2006 at 11:02 PM
It occurred to me today that when it comes to tempos, we simply don’t do enough practice involving the prime numbers. Is it possible that by clinging to multiples of five (or fours) when picking metronome speeds, our cognitive paths have developed ruts of mundanity? Could I be missing some important mental epiphany by doing so?I charted all the prime numbers up to 1,319 by color-coding the various multiples (which, as a byproduct, also creates a nifty pattern for a potential future quilting project). From now on, we will be using only prime numbers when specifying tempos. We feel pretty good about this decision.
Posted on April 17, 2006 at 11:45 PM
Posted on April 18, 2006 at 12:10 AM
Posted on April 18, 2006 at 3:02 AM
Posted on April 18, 2006 at 4:52 AM
Posted on April 18, 2006 at 12:33 PM
....
*passes out*
....
Even EPT* can't decipher this one.
*See this.
Posted on April 18, 2006 at 2:52 PM
Posted on April 18, 2006 at 3:29 PM
Neil
Posted on April 18, 2006 at 7:16 PM
Posted on April 19, 2006 at 5:33 PM
This entry has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.











