We have thousands of human-written stories, discussions, interviews and reviews from today through the past 20+ years. Find them here:
From the movies
September 12, 2007 at 11:26 PM
Greetings,Here in Japan, and presumably elsewhere, there have been some big shifts in the movie rental/owning business. It use dot be that if you wanted a video for a week you went to a shop and paid a lot of money. Then came DVDs and it way somewhat similar. But something changed and now you can buy DVDs in convenience stores for not much more than the cost of rental and certainly less than taking your family to the movie theater. At first these were old Cary Grant and John Wayne era stuff but now it seems a new movie comes out and goes on sale almost simultaneously.
It also seems that this new source is an outlet for very second rate new movies that are barely worth the energy of marketing in the usual way. I have picked up some very odd ones recently for a pittance. Once such, Scary movie number 3, is made, presumably by the team who turned out all those spoof movies with Charlie Sheen involving planes. It pokes fun at among other many of the great movies of the decade such as the Matrix. It actually does have some genuinely funny moments and since I have nothing better to do today I am musing on why they are funny. How does this team keep churning out stuff utterly lacking in depth that is at times, side splitting?
I think it is an interesting combination of interpretation out of context and enlargement of the norm. An example of the former from a same genre movie:
a) No family?
b) No it’s just me and my bike.
a) Aaaa. A loner.
b) No. I paid for it.
Or the latter: girlfriend a visits girlfriend b who is in the throes of an emotional crisis. B is spooning up ice-cream as comfort food as is standard in developed countries these days. However the tub of Haagen Darz ice cream is about 10 liters in size.
In some senses these things relate to music making for me. The first step in understanding a passage is to play it literally as it is written on the page. But there is so much more to do with context. Where it is situated in the overall structure; what is its mood in relation to the immediate context; what is the mood and character of the piece; what of the context in which the work was written or even the period?
Larger than life? I think this is a question of what people hear as opposed to what we hear. I read somewhere that there has to be something like a ten percent drop in dynamic before the ear registers that a dynamic has changed in apiece of music. Not sure how true that is but as Ms. Delay once said in relation to dynamics and character `you have to hit the audience over the head with a hammer.` The practice room is not the same as being on stage.
Cheers,
Buri
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 12:37 AM
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 1:13 AM
you take lunch breaks?!!!
I think what really helps is to play over an dover again with the piano (an leanr the piano part of course). Once the harmony gets into your system a sense of re;lative significance begins to emerge.
Cheers,
Buri
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 1:52 AM
Practice with piano, oh what a good advice! Without the piano part, I’m really not doing the whole piece. Unfortunately I don’t have any piano accompanist to practice with. I don’t know how useful is to study the piano score.
This is the only piece so far that my teacher thought I got it right musically at my first try, but I feel there must be more to it. Right now, it sounds to me like a very stubborn little person, against all the disabilities and defects, announces to the universe that he matters and he has something to say. Silly me, I know.
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 1:46 AM
Shakespeare was quite street smart. And though we've added a lot of drama to our love for the Bard, often I can't help to feel he was just being silly.
I was listening to Andre Rieu on PBS a few minutes ago. The performers and performance was quite animated. And the audience loved it, including myself.
Sartre would've done well to consider this. The reverse is true as well though. Social Novelists wrapped scathing critiques of society and government in the most absurd imagery.
This innuendo grande, excites a child's imagination. But, when taken in the seriousness with which it was meant, it becomes something very different. Lower that stick citizenry! Your standards shall, and have followed.
So this context thing Mr. Buri, is far reaching beyond a phrase.
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 2:09 AM
The Bard was exceptionally silly. I agree we try to attreibute too much profoundity to a lot of his stuff.
Cheers,
Buri
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 2:25 AM
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 2:30 AM
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 3:06 AM
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 4:32 AM
Yixi, that`s the F # minor Largo yes. Was jsut browsing Arkivmusic.com and found a recording by David Nadien whihc is probably awesome.
Release Date: 09/24/2002
Label: Cembal D'amour Catalog #: 117 Spars Code: n/a
Composer: Pablo de Sarasate, Max Bruch, Giuseppe Tartini, Francesco Maria Veracini, Fritz Kreisler,
Niccolò Paganini, Franz Schubert, Robert Schumann, Johannes Brahms
Performer: Boris Barere, David Nadien, Samuel Sanders, David Hancock
Orchestra/Ensemble: Hungarian State Opera Orchestra
Cheers,
Buri
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 2:36 PM
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 3:33 PM
Posted on September 13, 2007 at 10:31 PM
This entry has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.










