and Nathan Milstein
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHsun1umZ0Q&t=4s&fbclid=IwAR0SKpySo1RfrtCCnxJC_-mpQ11bOHyefl-f4WpjY1Za8apKinmpgwAbAi0
Steven, personally I am never sure about an underlying "tactus" across different tempi: I find it robs the movements of their inherent contrasts.
But it has to work, though. Certainly, the C-Major prelude is easier to imagine than to play at 60bpm. But keep it light so as to think more in terms or barlines than individual beats, and it could be quite effective.
I'd think something closer to 70bpm, perhaps a relaxed 66, would work on the g-minor, though. Same tempo, very different kinds of experiences in prelude and fugue.
Stephen
The Milstein adagio tends to treat chords as ornaments that lead up to the next tone in the melody. This seems to give the melody more impetus where Hahn and Ehnes are unfolding the melody in the context of the harmony.
One is not better than the other, IMO, just different and each brilliant in their own way.
Ehnes Adagio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI2uF_b_0Wo
Milstein on the other hand makes the music live. He uses more rubato and especially dynamics to give the music shape.
I would expect someone of Hahn's generation to pay more attention to the period instrument people who would probably play this even faster than Milstein. But she does very much the opposite. I love her Mozart sonatas where her style fits the music but her Bach bores me.
??
Yes, it's humbling, and scary in so far as it proves that such a level of technical perfection is possible, and thereby sets it as a modern standard of achievement.
I don't begrudge her that perfection, and found that there's much music to be appreciated with that, instead of the distractions which arise from the older ones, especially when intonation goes off at times. I'd kill to play like that, if not literally, then at least commit some number of other socially reprehensible acts, if that's what it takes.
Jeewon - I have Midori's set and really like it! I've been on a Milstein kick lately, and Enescu's are quite nice too (if you can be a forgiving listener).
It was his very last performance in Chicago, and he was (I think) 80 or 81. He played the 2nd Partita. It was all beyond anything I have ever heard by anyone (live or in recordings).
And Milstein's Chaconne was truly in a class by itself. I don't think I am exaggerating when I say that there were moments when one felt that one was listening to the actual voice of Bach. And there were several professional violinists in the audience (one of whom I know very well) who had the same reaction.
In my lifetime of listening to violinists (in person and in recordings) this was the most transcendent performance I have ever heard.
I hope that everyone has had, or will have, a musical experience like this, as a listener or a performer.
I will never forget the 18 year old Hilary making her debut with the Cleveland Orchestra (Mendelssohn) with the C major Largo as the encore (I was a very impressionable fifth grader) and thinking there was nothing lovelier that I had heard to date.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
Milstein is clearly more interested in making the phrases speak, and is much freer in rhythm in order to make that happen. Not every detail adds up consistently, I think-- this was a live performance? So maybe some risks that didn't quite make the cut. But more what I would hope a master musician would be fussing around with AFTER he could have learned to play it like Hahn.
FWIW, I have a theory on the tempo of the movement, which may be part of what steers to Milstein. The first movements of a minor and C Major both go attacca into the fugue. The g-minor is the only one that doesn't, and so Bach marks the fugue alla breve. He doesn't need to on the others-- they use the same logic Handel uses in his orchestral suites, where the French Overture tumbles into a fugato section that has the same underlying pulse. The trick, then, is to find a tempo where the heavily-subdivided quarter-notes of the Adagio will be identical to the heavily-subdivided half-notes of the Fugue. This makes the fugue a hair more relaxed than some play it, and forces a different sort of expression from the Adagio. Something more like a funeral march than a dreamy meditation. The rolling chords could be something like the drumrolls hinted at in the Eroica 2nd movement, or stated explicitly in the opening of Mahler 5. At Beethoven's marked tempo, of course.
Which feeds into my other bizarre theory-- that the prelude/fugues from these sonatas are a representation of Easter weekend. Good Friday in this one, the wailing melismas in the a-minor Sonata for Saturday, and the serene but flowing and rising arrival of joy in the C Major for Easter.