So, out of curiousity, I put a set of Vision strings on it -- and lo and behold, it sounded exactly like the other violin I tried in the shop (which also had Vision strings). So, now I'm wondering if the reason I didn't like the other one was because of the strings, not the intrinsic properties of the instrument itself.
Luckily, my mom and dad are close and my mom is still very interested in my playing -- and so they're driving an hour to the shop and back to go borrow the other violin! (Thanks, Mom and Dad! You rock!) The owner was very gracious and even offered to put different strings on it so I could give it a fair try. I'm pretty sure that I'm going to buy one or the other (and it's not like she's got ten other people wanting to try these violins), so I don't feel like I'm taking too much advantage of her.
More updates as I try the two of them. :) No matter what, though, I've realized that I cannot go back to the violins I've been playing on for so long. Yesterday evening as I played on the Luthier's stage, Mom requested the "2nd Seitz" (I forget what number it is, but it's the 2nd in Suzuki book 4, which is her favorite) and she said that it was the best I'd ever played it. The dynamics came through, probably for the first time ever, simply because the violin really responds. It has tone even when soft, so I can actually do big dynamic changes without getting weak, scratchy pianissimos and crunched fortissimos.
If only I'd woken up 15 years ago! :)
This entry has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Elmar Oliveira International Violin Competition
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine