The question is, when do you stop trading in or upgrading your violin? Obviously - if you have a violin that you absolutely love the sound of, you wouldn’t upgrade it. On the other hand, if the violin you own isn’t a violin you love the sound of any longer, do you continue to trade/upgrade until you do find that sound even if it goes above the price of what’s needed for your level of playing/use? Or do you stay with that violin and go on a search for different strings hoping to find a sound you’ll love?
On the other hand, are you a person who appreciates the quality of instruments as the price goes higher and are interested in upgrading slowly as a manner of owning/playing some different, yet amazing, instruments over the course of your life?
I’d be very interested in knowing how others feel about this topic and what your “strategy” has been in life as a violin player and owner!
Tweet
Some people pick one violin from the first shop they visit, play it for the next fifty years, and never give changing anything a thought. Some own a collection and choose one to play depending on the mood. Someone might spend a million on a violin and only play Twinkle Twinkle on it.
If you keep thinking about how you aren't satisfied with the sound of your violin, there's no harm in going around a few shops and trying some others. Or some bows, as Mary Ellen suggested. It can be an enjoyable process on its own, even if in the end you decide not to buy anything. Maybe you’ll find that nothing you can reasonably afford is better than what you have, and go back to playing yours with a new peace of mind. Maybe you’ll find one you fall in love with that is affordable. Maybe you’ll find that a different bow is what you are actually looking for.
Either way, I feel that closing that gestalt is better than pushing the thought away every time you open the case. And anything you decide is likely to be cheaper than owning a collection of vintage cars, so there’s that.
Myself, I’m currently travelling for work a lot between wildly different climates and have a violin that is fine in all ways: pleasant, plays nicely, doesn’t hold me back, and isn’t so valuable I’d be excessively worried about something happening to it. I’ve played better ones, and I might look for something else once I’ve settled and have more disposable income, but for now it’s not on my mind.
Consider the vocal qualities of really great singers: they are all recognizably different and unique, but they are all great. It is the same with good violins. Individuals might prefer one or another because of personal preferences, but they are all good.
Once you begin comparing violins that meet the baseline requirements for a good violin, it then becomes a subjective comparison of differences between violins based on personal perceptions, preferences, and experiences. Many of the tone qualities of individual violins can change or be changed by bow used, string selection, set-up, humidity, room acoustics, etc.
(Do you keep your violin humidified?)
I own a collection of great violins that I have curated over a lifetime, and I enjoy playing all of them. (I still enjoy playing my first good violin that I purchased out of an attic almost 50 years ago.) It would be difficult for me to rank them in order of good, better, best because they are all great, but they are also all different. I enjoy them all because they are all different.
You could try different strings and set-ups on your current violin, and you could also trial different violins and bows to compare with your current instrument. Take your current violin to the shop to compare with other violins, or ideally, bring some trial violin home to play in the space where you are most familiar with the sound of your current violin.
I would suggest that before looking for something new you might determine whether the problems you have with your current instrument are caused by issues with playing technique, the bow you’re using with it, the strings, or the setup. If you know that none of these things are holding your instrument back, it can add some peace of mind to the decision-making process.
If you can afford it and want it, there's no reason not to buy something you desire. I certainly would buy a Strad if I could afford it!
Certainly if you're dissatisfied with what you have, and it no longer suits your needs, trade laterally or trade up as suits your budget.
Another reason not to upgrade is that you are used to playing on your instrument.
One does not want to fool themselves into thinking that a better instrument will solve problems that are caused by insuffient technique.
The last two comments apply more to instances in which the musician already has a quality violin.
I think the urge to collect and always be on the lookout for better can become a distraction from practice and practical work, but at some point, when a violin really isn't keeping up with the repertoire, it may be time to upgrade (cashflow notwithstanding).
What happened along the road is that while improving in playing (and ear) my taste in instruments evolved in parallel. I had the chance to play the French violin many years later at the dealership where I had 'traded up' - and found it dull and difficult compared with #4. Each change gave me an instrument with more possibilities and with more challenges - and served to stimulate my interest and stoke my enthusiasm.
If the sound out of your instrument is no longer giving you the excitement, pleasure and satisfaction that pulls you into the practice room then you've simply grown out of it - and I am going to guess that its not the bow, you would know that. Go find another, trade up, trade down but find the violin that sounds as if you are playing from your heart. You won't regreat it - I never did.
And yes, I may well have reached my apex-violin - but only time will tell.
In addition to the French violin, I have a 1930 Roth that’s beautiful. It has great tone, good projection and is very responsive. It’s a bit louder instrument and is great for music like Beethoven, Brahms. It’s not an instrument that I like when I need a sweeter, lighter tone. I was looking to the French violin to fill that aspect of it. It’s better in that department than the Roth but still just not quite there.
Looks like I’m heading to my shop in the next couple of weeks!
I have a very specific criteria that has allowed me to stay with the same violin (different bows) for my entire career.
Occasionally I will ask professionals that I know to play my instrument with my bow(s). For the longest time the sound they were able to produce from my instrument was far superior to the sound I could produce. I did have third parties listening to both of play the same music to get rid of bias. Bow changes had the most significant effects.
I did have a fling with a "Better" violin early in my playing and it was a disaster. I was more frustrated.
About a year ago I asked a friend to evaluate my playing against that of a professional. Finally, after decades I could match tone and sound quality. If I were much younger it would be time to upgrade.
This method will not work for everyone. I started my search with the maxim "A poor workman blames his tools" (A poor musician blames his instrument).
Since I'm not a professional and I no longer preform (evening driving has become next to impossible) it really doesn't matter.
Perhaps you have mastered your instrument and are getting all that is possible from it. Before spending more on a "better" instrument check to see if becoming a better musician is required.
Cheers Carlo
I started messing about with 19c bows a few years ago, and I've found that getting their best has required rethinking my right hand technique (so THAT's what those old guys were trying to get me to do in the last century!). When I manage to make that all work, a good modern instrument can do battle with a good old one. A Needham, say, doesn't sound like a Gagliano or Serafin out of the case, but, when paired with a Pajeot or Dodd or Voirin or Henry, it can get some equally remarkable results.
The exercise of trying antique bows has also made me a smarter shopper of new bows, which is a much less expensive way to leap over limitations.
I would stop upgrading or buying new (additional) instruments once I don't feel the need anymore. Once I am completely happy with the violin/s I own. That could be one, two or several ones, depending on the way I use them and my purse. If you have three violins but only ever use one, sell the others. If you have three violins and use them on and off or for different music, keep them. If you just like to try new violins, have the money and find one you like that is different enough to your others violins to be worth buying, do so!
If you have two, a standard and a backup violin, no matter if as a professional or hobby player, I would try to make sure that you like them both. That the backup is not a second-class violin to you that you actually resent playing.
The other violin that I own (other than a electric) is one that I’ve always liked, but have never truly loved. I purchased it as a step up from what I had - it was definitely better but I’ve never loved playing it the way I loved playing the Roth. Both are loud, powerful instruments and I realized that I wanted a violin that had a sweeter, softer side to it that neither of these have (despite many different types of strings). As I’ve been practicing some higher positions on the G string, I have also noticed that I can shift much easier on the Roth and struggle quite a bit more on my other violin.
So, that’s what I’m doing. I’m keeping the Roth as my powerhouse violin and looking to trade the other one for something that’s got a different voice, one that will complement the Roth. I’m also paying more attention to shifting so that I ensure I purchase a violin that I don’t struggle with quite as much.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine