Is there a point where knicks, dings, or scratches need more than cosmetic attention? I have loaned out several nice instruments to students for use and accept that these beauty marks and blemishes are part of the history and character of an instrument that is played. Can these at some point lead to longer-term irreversible or costly damage to the wood or structure of the violin? And if so, any thoughts on when they should be returned to the luthier for touch-ups or repairs? Or should this simply be part of the annual check-up?
I believe that a deep enough scratch can become a crack. Then if there is any doubt, as David said, show it to a qualifies luthier.
David I thought that makers often charge more for an antiqued violin ;)
LOL
With luck, they won't be antiqued in a way which causes self-destruction.
While I agree that matters of serious judgment should be left to professionals, everyone knows the difference between a small surface scratch and knocking one of the bout corners off and exposing the purfling.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Elmar Oliveira International Violin Competition
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
September 28, 2012 at 03:37 PM · To determine whether they will lead to more serious damage, they would need to be examined by a professional, and a decision made on a case-by-case basis.