I do not have as much time to practice as I would like, so I am looking for string quartet music that is not a concerto for the first violin, and that does not bore the violist and the cellist. I'm not very familiar with the quartet literature, although I have performed (as 1st violin) a handful of Mozart and Haydn quartets and viola quintets. Is there anything for 2 violins, viola, and cello that features the lower voices?
Haydn Op 74 No 3 (Rider) - only kidding ...
OR Haydn Emperor quartet ... only kidding again ...
Karen, the title asks a different question from the text. I've never come across anything where the viola and cello do the heavy lifting while the violins have 64 straight bars of afterbeats, but there are plenty where everyone has a great part.
The Mendelssohn quartets give everyone plenty to do. Tchaikovsky op.11 will challenge everyone, and Dvorak always assumed the lower voices were as strong as the violins. The "Nocturne" movement of Borodin #2 is a cellist's dream come true, and the Glazunov "Five Novelettes" have great cello & viola parts. Mozart's "Haydn Quartets" have decent, if not fabulous, viola/cello parts. I've played one Shostakovich quartet- can't remember which at the moment- that had a to-die-for viola solo in one movement.
Lots of Haydn is, as you say, a violin concerto with everyone else just playing chuck- chuck-chuck. Shoo away one violinist and look at trios, too. Even Haydn trios have good parts for all.
Lisa, I'm afraid I really do want easy violin parts. I inherited some quartet music recently from the collection of a former member of the orchestra, now deceased: mostly Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven. I was looking through the music and found a Beethoven quartet that I also owned a recording of (Op. 132), listened, and loved the recording. Then I tried to play the 1st violin part. Um, yeah. I'd love to really work on it, if I didn't have both a big vacation and several significant other projects between now and the performance. And the second violinist has even more constraints.
I did find a few Haydn movements that I think will be okay: I will only need to spend an hour or two total on my part outside of rehearsal, the second violin can sight-read, and the viola and cello have something more interesting than boom-chick-boom-chick. Minuetto movements in particular seem to be good for this.
In fact those two Haydn quartets I mentioned have difficult parts for 2nd, viola and cello. On the Rider in fact the cellist asked me to take it slower as he was getting nervous before a masterclass. I had to point out that after the opening bars there is a GP bar, and the cello starts on his own again, so the tempo was down to him! In the end we played it pretty fast and it worked.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
International Violin Competition of Indianapolis
Violinist.com Holiday Gift Guide
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.

Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn

Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
June 19, 2012 at 06:18 PM · Sure! Have a look at the Boccherini quartets :)