We have thousands of human-written stories, discussions, interviews and reviews from today through the past 20+ years. Find them here:
Notation of Harmonics
Greetings. I'm a composer and I have another violin related question.What do you like to see in the notation of harmonics?
Specifically, with natural harmonics, which do you prefer?
The sounding pitch with the harmonic symbol, or the diamond notehead where the finger touches the string, along with the string number?
What about when it is a natural harmonic interspersed with artificial harmonics? For example, a low Ab touch-4th (sounding Ab 15ma) sliding down to touch-4th on the open G string (sounding G 15ma)?
TIA
Tweet
Replies (7)
Simple naturals as jean says - note as sounded with a 0. Although you could use that for your G example too - if you write G5 with a 0, it's unambiguous. It might be too confusing when there are 4ths and 5ths and more flying around, but sometimes the choice can be left to the player, eg whether I choose fifth on G or octave on D depends on ease of fingering. Either would be indicated by D5 with a 0 above it.
My string orchestra is playing a piece where the last note is a harmonic A written with three notes, all with lozenges, the note that sounds (A6), A4 and the 4th above it. It's quite funny because I can hear people around me debating if it's double-stopping. But it's not necessarily a bad way to notate - when you just have the fingering and not the final note, it's more like guitar notation, which I hate, and it makes playing it seem less musical.
Possibly best is simply to indicate the final note with a lozenge in all cases and nothing else. Then the violinist can choose their favoured way to achieve it.
(when I say 4th and 5th, I mean perfect 4th and 5th. I don't mean 4th finger, which may be what previous posters mean)
Does my concern make sense or it is this a non-issue?
Coincidentally I have Vaughan Williams' charterhouse suite on my stand, and it's got some good examples of instruction.










