So if another version is better, is it possible to by a copy of the autograph separately? Or maybe its worth purchasing the Galamian just for this?
Is this the right edition for the Szeryng version?
But I think the answer for this right now is
a) whatever your teacher wants you to buy (even if it's Galamian, gulp) but if Galamian then also
b) something with better edits and/or an Urtext.
I currently have the Szeryng (which I love), a Flesch/Peters version that includes the urtext on the line below his edits (so, page turns...), a Wiener Urtext edition also from Schott, and the Galamian, which a more recent teacher preferred.
I will say that many of the current generation of teachers seem to have learned from the Galamian edition and are therefore partial to it–but I don't love the fingerings, and the bowings don't always make sense to me. I'm intrigued by the RBP but since I'm really not working on Bach right now, it would be somewhat gratuitous.
Otherwise, get the Henle urtext. It will be a good recipient of your own final (hah!) ideas, and will reduce your dependence on other editors.
If that is too expensive, there is a public domain copy of Barenreiter on IMSLP.
I should probably go back and look at the Galamian. He wasn't a famous teacher for no reason at all. But when I first used it, it annoyed me because of all the unnecessary markings and (I thought) unmusical fingerings. It didn't help that I was studying with one of his disciples, who was very good at saying "Mr Galamian says..." I improved from her lessons, but not during the year. It took a break each summer before I got past my irritation and figured out what she really meant for me to learn.
One more option, not as commonly seen today: Joachim and Moser. Not sure how much of that is actually Joachim, but there are some very useful, if old-fashioned, ideas, and a transcript of the urtext running underneath.
My favorite discs are Grumiaux (trancendental elegance), Mullova (non-quirky HIP), and Enesco (heart rending and majestic).
My (limited) experience with the Allegro movements is that fingering them doesn't take a lot of imagination. Whenever there are a lot of single-position shifts, you find ways to do them on half-steps.
I too grew up on Galamian in an age where everyone did. He was still a dominant voice in violin pedagogy and some of my teachers were either students of his or “grand-students.” Much of my music was a Galamian edition, including Bach.
I’m sure others reading this had similar training, so sorry to offend your rosy nostalgia: those days are long gone and good riddance. It’s one thing when a young student needs every fingering and bowing dictated to them. But at a certain point—romantic concerti and Bach—they need to start figuring out things for themselves instead of slavishly following directions. That is an old-style way of teaching:
“Take dis musik und do vhat is written!”
Instead, the student should be buying the absolute cleanest urtext available and struggle. If something is obviously not working, then the teacher should lead the student to something better, but not by saying “just do what I do.” Often, students will try to make something work without having considered alternatives. The teacher should ask, “what else can you do here? Did you try second position?”
It’s more of a Socratic method that teaches students, if nothing else, the concept that they actually can think for themselves and start to make decisions.
It doesn’t mean they always will. Some students will, unfortunately, always be dependent and might never have the energy or initiative to puzzle out the music. They will need everything on a silver platter.
And the teacher, having been brought up in that tradition, or having lacked the training themselves (or still retaining their own hero worship, either for their Famous Teacher or favorite Famous Violinist), will not question what learned decades prior. They may be perfectly happy to serve it up on a silver platter. Or not have the energy or creativity to explore alternatives.
From a musical perspective, I found Szering’s Bach to be rather a bore: a loud, aggressive, Soviet-style with little nuance, unburdened by historical “baggage.” In fact, I found this to be true of Bach recording of most of the great violinists of the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Like him or not, at Tetlaff was a breath of fresh air: someone who actually thought about Bach instead of regurgitating stale traditions. So was Kremer…albeit frantic and lacking in tonal beauty.
Buy an urtext, learn to struggle make your own decisions, and teach your own students to explore and struggle.
2. The size of the music is very easy on the eyes.
3. If you can’t ignore her markings, the digital content has a very nice urtext that is clean and easy to read.
4. She made some cool digital content that pasted snippets of the autograph manuscript in context for study.
There are, however, a couple of interesting dynamic markings in the autographs, and one has to wonder if they are actually original. Why would Bach have wrote p and f in the A minor allegro, but almost nowhere else? Did he feel that strongly about an echo effect? It’s puzzling.
The fact that there is generally just one version each of the mentioned artists’ editions, whether Szering, Galamian, Pine, etc, is also puzzling to me. I studied Bach my whole career and my edits were never cemented in place—the movements changed over time as I studied with different teachers, listened to various versions, and thought about them. It seems strange that someone would print them up, in effect saying to the world, “this is how I do it. Period.”
After a bit of playing I figured out why: at every hardest point, Galamian has an extremely clever fingering to de-risk it, and many of them were far better than what I had been able to figure out on my own. He often uses second position to good effect, and in a few cases he uses nonobvious position choice for reasons of left hand balance.
That said, the manuscript at the end is just as valuable in the Galamian edition (and my teacher frequently sent me there for matters of bowing and dynamics), and I found myself loving Galamian's left hand ideas once I mastered it, but often disagreeing with his bowing choice (where it different from Bach's), and sometimes after I learned the notes I would play from the manuscript directly. In some cases I went back to Szeryng's bowings, where I didn't stick with what Bach had written (or not written).
Everything Galamian has is done for a reason, and it can be instructive to figure out the reason, even when you then remove it - some of his bowings which struck me as backwards were there to avoid an incorrect emphasis, etc, and while I may not choose to use them, I then need to solve hte problem he was solving some other way. There were, however, very few cases in which I could improve on his fingerings.
On the other hand, one thing I have noticed about editions "of a certain age" is that open strings were very much out of fashion. So were even-numbered positions. Maybe some shifts into 2nd position -- even for just a few notes -- will help you in the short term? I have found them useful in solo Bach.
Baroque practice, as I understand it, did encourage use of open strings, but with gut strings back then, the difference in color is probably not as pronounced. I also play viola, and this is not an issue for us. We use open strings all the time. The bottom line is you have to do what works best for you and sounds good rather than slavishly following conventions, etc.
I also signed up and "bought" the MIRIAM FRIED Bach S&P masterclass on-line a few years ago but only looked into the Chaconne thinking I had forever to follow up, but by the time I returned to it I found out my purchase was actually a 1-year rental that had expired. But her performances on CD are definitely worth hearing.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
International Violin Competition of Indianapolis
Violinist.com Holiday Gift Guide
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.

Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn

Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine