Hi all!
I had an opportunity to try one old violin. We don't have a lot of good violins in our country, they are very rare. So I have not very big experience with good violins! Please, help me with identifying this violin! Could you say something about it by pictures and sound sample?
The seller says it is original violin...but I have doubts! Also, the condition is not so good as you can see. Please, help me to understand the value of this violin!!!
Here is a link (say if you can't visit it) - http://sinfonietta.com.ua/old-antique-violins/master-violin-a-gragnani
Some photos on my facebook page - https://www.facebook.com/eugenia.violin.9/media_set?set=a.1421110278168312.1073741830.100008080604135&type=3
The sound - http://youtu.be/yAK-wJWVVdY
Thanks in advance!
I am pretty sure that it is a fake! Condition is poor too. Sound seems ok, but with that much reverb, nearly every violin can sound good...
The price is $6K. I'm not sure about the sound qualities. It sounds very nasally by itself. But while playing you don't hear it so much... It also has quite easy response, but is not very loud. Hope to get more opportunity to try it next time and to make recording without such reverberation.
Thanks. Hope to hear also other comments!
I agree with Lyndon.
Your biggest concern should be condition of this instrument and the total cost of ownership. In other words, how much money would you need to spend on this instrument to keep it structurally safe and functional?
Sound post crack on the back is more worrisome, but on the top will also affect the sound to some extent; not so long ago, a violin with a crack on the back would be a total write-off, but restorers are getting better and antique violins more expensive and difficult to find..... This spot probably sustains the strongest pressure per square mm, and the patch has to be done extremely well in order to last reasonably long time. Even with that, you are basically gambling against the laws of physics (imagine violin strings and back plate as a bow and sound post as an arrow pointing toward the back arch!) and your odds are low. A compromising solution would be to use a set of thin stings with the least possible tension, but then sound might not be good enough.
Regarding the dilemma if the instrument is genuine or not, I urge you to put that aside. Why? Because that is a cognitive trap: price is set under claim that this violin is genuine antique Italian and then "reduced" because of the condition of instrument, to make it appear as a good deal. It is not.
If it were not antique Italian, would you spend the same amount of money on repairs with a questionable outcome for instrument's stability and sound?
Here some pictures of Antonio Gragnanis:
Ihttp://www.christies.com/lotfinder/LargeImage.aspx?image=http://www.christies.com/lotfinderimages/d38193/d3819357x.jpg
http://www.bromptons.co/auction/10th-december-2012/lots/227-a-fine-italian-violin-by-antonio-gragnani-livorno-1793.html
I tried one out not too long ago. Sorry but can't see much resemblance.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Elmar Oliveira International Violin Competition
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
May 29, 2014 at 01:40 PM · I can't speak on the authenticity or not, but as to the condition, this instrument has soundpost cracks on both the top and the back, even if they were properly patched we're talking about no more than 20% of the value it might have without the cracks.