We have thousands of human-written stories, discussions, interviews and reviews from today through the past 20+ years. Find them here:

Origin or not original, it's the problem

October 7, 2009 at 03:14 PM ·

I bought a pretty old violin 2 years ago, Recently I had to take the back off to reglue the loose bass bar,

There is a label inside " Joseph Guarnerius Fecit" " Cremona anno 1714"...Everyone knows this label is not a true label.

But the interesting is under the label.

The luthier told me that there are some stamp and hand writing under the label.

After moved up the label , we found the stamp is " Mansuy" and hand writing is " a Pairs 1786".

We checked on internet and found this luthier was work in France during 1740 to 1786 and his vioin are not very expensive on the market.

So could anyone can help us to make those question clear:

(1) Why and who would put a fake label in it?

(2) Why this luthier "Mansuy" did not or did not want to put his own label in it? 

(3) Dose anyone have this luthier's label, can you show us his label?

(4) Why this luthier stamp on it instead of a label?

(5) Is this violin a true Mansuy's work? it it is not true , who would like to stamp a not famous luthier on it  then use another fake label to cover it?

If anyone is interested in this pleease link to my blog , I will put it some pictures on it.

My blog link:

http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/sijin_chen2000/article?mid=421&prev=-1&next=418

Replies (6)

October 14, 2009 at 03:18 AM ·

(1) Why and who would put a fake label in it?

Although I don't know for sure, I would guess either the maker or somebody who wanted to sell it for money. Obviously one could sell a violin more if it was a Guarneri rather than a Mansuy regardless of sound.

(2) Why this luthier "Mansuy" did not or did not want to put his own label in it? 

Don't know, sorry

(3) Dose anyone have this luthier's label, can you show us his label?

I actually do own a violin with the label of "Mansuy A Paris" with what looks to be some numbers below it. I see a "830" hand written, which looks like it could have been the year 1830, and the 1 has just worn off. Unfortunately I can't take a picture of it (at least right now). The label is hand cut, and the edges are very ragged and not evenly cut. The label is also fairly small.

With this said, I'm not entirely sure it is the 'actual' mansuy. It might be somebody from his family or shop.

(4) Why this luthier stamp on it instead of a label?

I'm not really sure, sorry.

(5) Is this violin a true Mansuy's work? it it is not true , who would like to stamp a not famous luthier on it  then use another fake label to cover it?

I'm guessing it is a real Mansuy violin. Logically, I don't understand why somebody would stamp another maker's work when that maker isn't a famous/well known person. A luthier would know more than I would about this.

 

I've tried looking up more information about this maker. I have yet to find much of any, unfortunately. I do love the sound that comes out of the violin, which is the most important to me :).

 

October 14, 2009 at 07:26 AM ·

Many thanks Mark A,

Thanks for your information, I do really like this violin and I find I love it more when I know her story and who made her.

This violin is light-orange color and sounds warm, sweet and beautiful.

By the way, could I ask you that what is the price range of your Mansuy violin?

 

Thanks again for your information.

October 14, 2009 at 09:37 PM ·

Hey,

 My violin is quite dark (in color), but *very* warm, which is why I like it. I don't remember exactly, but I think I paid around $3000? Plus or minus probably 500. I am extremely satisfied with it, so I don't wish to trade it up, atleast not for quite a while. Without my knowledge, I tried a $20,000 violin (mixed in with the rest of them) when I was testing out violins. I still liked this one better :).

Surprisingly, the neck is original. From my knowledge most older instruments all have had their neck replaced. This is one of the reasons I think mine might be more modern (ish, as in 19th, mabye even 20th century).

In the next few days, I'll see if I can take some pictures of the label and violin, and I'll put them up.

 

Cheers

 

October 15, 2009 at 12:51 AM ·

Hi Mark A,

Thanks for your reply and information of your violin.

I paid for this violin about US4600 and my teacher said this violin should be at the price range US25,000 to US37,500 if we just judge her by what she sounds.

My violin is very very old, the date is 1786 so she is about 230 years old.

I check on the net and found this Maker worked in Pairs around 1740 to 1786.

Therefore my violin might be the one of last work in the very end of Mansuy's life.

After his death someone bought his brand and countiune to produce respectable violin in Pairs.

 

My last teacher hates this violin very much because oneday he asked many students and musical teachers to set outside of our music room to judge which violin is the best one between his one and mine.

We tried three times and no one picked his violin once and his violin is a work of Modern Cremona master piece.

After that he really hate mine.....hahaha

Thanks for your reply again and wait for your pictures.

I will inform you and show you my violin pictures after her loose bass bar was reglued.

 

October 15, 2009 at 12:59 AM ·

I don't know if this applies to your violin, but Henley's Dictionary of violin makers states:

"Worked at Mirecourt, 1740-1786, though Paris sometimes is indicated. Thoroughly well-made instruments. Stradivarian modelling of normal measurements, not so broad at waist curves as that of general Mirecourt style. Wide grain belly wood, handsome slab back. Often a dull brownish-yellow varnish, but occasionally a light orange or reddish-brown of better quality. Tonal quality of agreeable fullness if not sweetness.  . . . Branded "Mansuy a Paris" or "Mansuy, Mirecourt". Many specimens seen dated 1900 and onwards which are products of a Mirecourt firm who purchased the brands.

October 15, 2009 at 01:31 AM ·

Thanks bob! that does answer a fair bit of questions.
 
A few weeks ago (when I first brought my violin to my teacher... it's farily new to me) we had a test run. He is also trying out violins, but well into the 6 figures. Out of the 4 I played (2 ones he was testing, his old one, and mine), he liked mine better than one of the ones he was testing out and his old one.  :D
 
"Stradivarian modelling" hmm... I found this a bit odd. I know my teacher isn't a luthier, but he does know a lot about violins. He said it looked more like a Guarneri model, with a few similarities to a strad model (sort of a mix of the two, leaning more toward a Guarneri model... If this makes any sense! lol). Mabye it's because it wasn't the original mansuy? Who knows :P
 
 

This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.

Facebook YouTube Instagram RSS feed Email

Violinist.com is made possible by...

Shar Music
Shar Music

Larsen Strings
Larsen Strings

Peter Infeld Strings
Peter Infeld Strings

JR Judd Violins
JR Judd Violins

Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases

Pirastro Strings
Pirastro Strings

Los Angeles Philharmonic
Los Angeles Philharmonic

Elmar Oliveira International Violin Competition
Elmar Oliveira International Violin Competition

Violinist.com Shopping Guide
Violinist.com Shopping Guide

Bobelock Cases

Violin Lab

Barenreiter

Bay Fine Strings Violin Shop

FiddlerShop

Fiddlerman.com

Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins

Southwest Strings

Metzler Violin Shop

Los Angeles Violin Shop

Violin-strings.com

Nazareth Gevorkian Violins

Subscribe

Laurie's Books

Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.

Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn

Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine