I’m looking at trying to purchase the kind of violin strings that would have been used in the late 19th century, by the likes of Joachim, Vieuxtemps, Ysaye and others.
The main things I’m trying to discover is:
1. The differences between plain gut or wound gut
2. Whether virtuosi of that period used a gut E string
3. What difference varnishing makes
4. Whether, even in that period, violinists had any covering on top of the gut eg. silver
5. Whether any of the modern gut core strings (eg. Oliv or Eudoxa) come close to that 19th century sound, or whether I’d be looking at more specialist/handmade strings (eg. Damian Dlugolecki, Gamut, etc.)
Also, in an age not noted for its uniformity, or even it’s equal temperament, was the ‘A’ generally lower than 440 or did this vary from town to town?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Vaughan Jones
Since I have done research and performed some recitals with these kinds of strings (and period pianos), I thought I would answer.
1.The differences between plain gut or wound gut
Two completely different worlds in terms of sound and approach to bowing & vibrato. Plain gut is much more sensitive to contact point and vibrato has to be very centered.
2.Whether virtuosi of that period used a gut E string
Yes. Steel Es came into being during WWI and after. In your list of violinists, only Ysaÿe experimented with them late in his career, and you can see that in the fingering choices for some of the runs in the solo sonatas.
3.What difference varnishing makes
I don't know, I have never tried them. Apparently they last longer and sound somewhat brighter.
4.Whether, even in that period, violinists had any covering on top of the gut eg. silver
Only the G string was covered until the 1920's (silver wound). During the late 20s and 30s, the D was gradually covered and there was experimentation with aluminium covered steel A strings, which Carl Flesch was the first to advocate. Heifetz for example, played on a plain gut A and D his entire career (and a Goldbrokat medium E). I believe that a copy of the Tricolore strings that he used and exact gauges has been remade in recent years.
5.Whether any of the modern gut core strings (eg. Oliv or Eudoxa) come close to that 19th century sound, or whether I’d be looking at more specialist/handmade strings (eg. Damian Dlugolecki, Gamut, etc.)
You should be looking at specialist strings. For myself I used Dlugolecki. The thing is that late 19th century soloists used very large gauge strings (those photos are actually accurate).
Also, in an age not noted for its uniformity, or even it’s equal temperament, was the ‘A’ generally lower than 440 or did this vary from town to town?
A438 was more common in the late 19th century and A440 was actually adopted in Germany after WWI if my memory is OK. Going back, it seems that A432-A435 was more in vogue from the early to mid 19th century.
Hope this helps!
Cheers!
I wonder when the predilection for low tension gut strings such as Eudoxa started during the 20th century-nowadays, many of us gut-core users are preferring heavier gut tension (though in my case, the opposite for synthetics, where I generally prefer lower tension.)
(Also, I don't find gut to be dark, but rather warm, to a degree. They have some beautiful "upper mids" that make them sound brighter and "clearer" than popular "gut replacements", such as Obligato... which sound good but a bit hollow.)
Both Mr. Dlugolecki and Mr. Larson can offer good 19th century replicas for said period historical performances, as aforementioned. These strings are not too expensive either, at least in the US.
For modern gut-core use, *I* would stick to steel E and a good set of gut GDA, wound or pure, never too light.
My varnished A has lasted for a while, and is more weather-stable than Olivs & Eudoxas. Amazing benefits; I would recommend it without hesitation.
The strings seem to have been on the thick side compared with modern uncovered gut (see https://www.gamutmusic.com/tricolore-string-return/, and earlier on Pagaini's strings, https://ricerche.aquilacorde.com/i-nostri-lavori/65/nicolo-paganini-e-le-corde-di-budello/).
However, perhaps some soloists were favouring thicker strings than most players? I do not think the answer is readily available. Even thin uncovered gut strings can be a bit slow to sound. Modern microphones might have picked up their scratchiness. Maybe a 19th century soloist instrument setup only makes sense with a different use of bow and fantastic right hand technique, unrecorded, in a large hall before an audience?
Sweeter sound and frequent string breakages.
Speaking of bows, we are of course talking about already modern bows in the late 19th century. Soloists tended to favour Tourte bows and weight was in the 56-59 grams range, whereas today, many of the modern bows tend to be above 60 grams. You get into more historical bows when talking about pre-1830-1840.
Using metal to wrap the G string to reduce mass was already done in the early 19th century.
Although steel Es did appear in the early 20th century, it wasn't until WWI that they became more widely used and accepted.
Cheers!
Those interviewed include Eugene Ysaye, Leopold Auer, Fritz Kreisler, Maud Powell, and many others. The book is free and really a very interesting look at the thoughts and processes of virtuoso violinists of that period.
Neil
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
Note that the violin gut G has to be metal wound to give it the necessary weight. A plain gut G would be so fat in diameter as to be useless for anything other than Early (pre-Baroque) Music.