The latest example is frok the Kitchener-Waterloo Symphony, whose board has cancelled all activities for the coming season, just before it was to begin. The purpose of the institution is to perform. To stop such performances is just mind boggling.
I understand that there are financial concerns. However, the finances should be spent to continue operations. If there are no more funds so be it. However, one would think the board would inform the various parties long before the funds run out.
Boards have taken other actions which undermine the mission of the organizations. Reducing pay, decreasing the number of concerns, shortening seasons, etc.
If you want your local arts organizations to thrive, ensure they are not run by people who approve of such actions.
Tweet
It typifies the selfishness and narcissism of the "I got mine" crowd that can't seem to see beyond their own limitations.
One thing was fairly clear - we all had the same kinds of problems to solve, but during those years the problems were fairly consistent. However, our community was fairly stable with a population of about 30,000 humans and one very large federal organization with over 5,000 employees - a company town with reasonable salaries and reasonable costs. This probably made us fairly stable even in times of general economic uncertainty.
What we did not have were the kinds of problems unique to the era of COVID and its economic and psychological effects. Organizations that have depended on audience attendance for survival since 2020 have had unique problems.
I don't think it is useful to thumb our noses at the board members faced with unique problems of this era. (When I lived in that community the Concert Series had 6 annual concerts performed by such as Mischa Elman, Pinchas Zukerman, the LA Philharmonic with Zubin Mehta, the Julliard String Quartet. Last time I checked I could not find a true classical concert in a season's schedule.)
Why not hire Taylor Swift or Lady Gaga?
Why not blame the fossil fuel industry?
Orchestras don't shut down this suddenly without some serious mismanagement.
Note: they cancelled the season, they did not say (yet) that the orchestra has been terminated. Perhaps there is a glimmer of hope?
I would say it’s still a common thing for people who make significant donations to end up on boards, but this ends up undermining the organizations, because it turns into a way to buy into authority without really caring about the mission statement.
That is not to say that all boards and board members are corrupt, just that it is a common issue. This reminds me of a scene in Sinclair Lewis’ “Babbitt” where the idea of an orchestra is pitched in a meeting. It is brought up as a way to make the town look more high-brow, and the way it’s openly brought up as a means to an end is hilarious while also being devastatingly accurate.
I have some experience with bad boards. I am guessing that this is some kind of ill-advised power play by one or more people with a lot of power and absolutely no understanding of the industry.
From what I have seen recently it seems these boards are simply undermining these organizations.
There is a fundamental lack of humanity, common sense, and charity.
From what I have seen recently it seems these boards are simply undermining these organizations.
There is a fundamental lack of humanity, common sense, and charity.
It's possible that the board has discovered that season tickets or even individual tickets for concerts are not selling as much as expected. A big expected donation could have failed to come in. A needed grant might be withheld (because the granting organization is having issues, or the orchestra is having trouble complying with the grant conditions). There are plenty of possibilities when orchestras are in a fragile state -- which most are, postpandemic.
This one doesn't look like a union-busting attempt. I suspect cancelling the whole season instead of doing part of a season is the result of the way the orchestra's contracts are written. Likely there are fewer penalties to pay if the whole slate is cancelled before the season starts.
It looks like the KW Symphony's board consists of various minor pillars of the community, but they seem more akin to the type of people who get involved in their HOA than the type of people who are the movers and shakers of the city. I would guess that this situation is probably over the head of most of the board members, and out of their realm of experience.
I don’t know if it’s allowed to post a go fund me link in the discussion here, but for those who may wish to express their support for Peter and his colleagues in a tangible form, a search for “Support Your KWSymphony Musicians” on the Gofundme platform should do it.
Also, I’m very sorry to hear this news.
One would think the library would have little value. Orchestras are going under, not buying sheet music. Same goes for colleges. That and the change to digital. Who would bid on it?
When we successfully bought back our music library, it was one of the best things that had happened up to that point. I can’t tell you how amazing it is to be performing using the same music that I have been playing from here for over 30 years – my own bowings and fingerings in the parts.
So in theory it is worth a lot. Practically, I do not see a lot of bidders.
Bankruptcy is a bad sign, as it means there is debt, as opposed to funds running low. However that debt may be the contracts to pay the musicians.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine