The Nebel brand came from the Violin House of Weaver originally, where violins were imported “in the white” and varnished in-house. When Mr. Weaver sold the rights to the Rudoulf Doetsch name to the Eastman company in the early 2000s, several of his other brands, including Albert Nebel, were also included in the deal. At first, Eastman continued to use the sources Weaver used for the instruments, but they eventually decided to cut costs by having everything made at their factory. As a result, the quality is not what it once was, although they still make decent instruments for students. They aren’t really much different from any other Chinese factory brand, other than having the well-known brand name.
If your child has played them and finds one to be easy to play and it’s set up well, there’s no reason why the Nebel would be a bad choice. It’s probably a little prettier than the Luger and may have slightly nicer wood in the back. For fractionals, a good trade-in policy is a big benefit, as the resale market for violins that aren’t full-sized is not very good.
It’s important for kids that they have an instrument they enjoy playing. If the teacher agrees that it’s a better sounding/more responsive instrument, I wouldn’t hesitate to buy the more expensive one.
If he changes his mind go back to the shop. Rinse and repeat
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
The name and number of an instrument does not tell you anything about it. Being made of natural materials, and made by human hands, every instrument is different (bows too).