Here's my current working concept, and I'm definitely open to critique.
For reference, my target audience here is early to middle intermediate students--around Suzuki 3-6, Wohlfahrt and Trott type stuff
-An etude should be within grasp for a student to sightread and learn well over the course of the week. Notes, rhythms, and general musicality should be expected but that should not be the "hard work" of the etude.
-The purpose of the etude should be clear in the lesson and the student should have the understanding and physical technique to execute it. We might want to overview particular challenge spots.
(A particular etude might be useful for multiple concepts but usually we would focus on only one at a time.)
-My expectation for the next lesson would be that the etude itself sounds accurate, comfortable, musical, and that the technique points are significantly more secure. If there are specific challenges that can be worked out, the same etude might be reassigned. Otherwise, if the concept is ready to be applied it goes into rep; or if it just still needs more general strengthening, I would probably apply it into a parallel or review etude, or scales, or improvisation exercise.
(I think etudes serve very well for review, and for revisiting to layer or extend concepts, but I think continuing to sit on the same etude just for general improvement gets boring and counterproductive pretty quickly. I would love feedback on this particularly, since this is one of the things I'm really not sure how others handle!)
Thanks all!
Tweet
If more of the first, do you still feel there is significant advantage in the etude form over simple focused exercises?
When they are older (high school) she will give them whole etudes and caprices.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
Of course, some "etudes" are actually fun to play and even to listen to. (I think those are the best kind but you can't always have everything.)
The biggest problem might be finding teachers who are sufficiently familiar with the etude literature to be able to link students' obvious deficits to the ideal etudes. I am not familiar with the training the best teachers have had but I suspect the best players who also teach were students who did not need to work on etudes that much. Perhaps some of their studies involved exposure to much of the etude literature (perhaps they could read right through whole books of them). Certainly, mine did not. My brief exposure to a splendid teacher (and performer) in a masterclass 40 years ago indicated that she had a deep knowledge of necessary etudes. (Since her teacher had been Heifetz, I suspect she had had to play very, very many etudes.)