Now I'm not getting my hopes up that this is a somewhat valuable instrument, as my first violin was a Stradivarius as the label proudly proclaimed, albeit one made in Czechoslovakia long after Stradivarius had died!
Here are some more pics of the Klotz:
https://ibb.co/sH3HQJH
https://ibb.co/yVqWPNn
https://ibb.co/St3vz6B
https://ibb.co/60KFS2B
https://ibb.co/hKjw3Ts
https://ibb.co/4KnXCRj
Your thoughts on the instrument would be welcome.
There were two Aegidius Klotz violin makers and according to Henley's "Universal Dictionary of Violin & Bow Makers" only the first (and better maker) sometimes signed his instruments "Egidi Klotz" and with the rest of the label you quote - and only he could have made in 1708.
But looking at more of your photos, I think Mathew is right that it is not an original - but that does not mean it might not be a very good violin. I have a niece who was a virtuoso level level in her youth and her instrument was a "Mittenwald."
You could say the labels were fake, since they did approximately look like those used by the named maker, and of course that is what gets people excited about attic finds. A few of them were more honestly labelled "Copy of..." though even then the experts say the resemblance didn't go much further than having 4 strings and 2 f-holes.
As Lyndon says, there are plenty of them still around and many of them make good first violins at a few hundred dollars or pounds if they have been properly set up. The price relates to their origin (usually around Markneukirchen in Germany) so if you find one that sounds good and plays well you can get a bargain.
----------
Could you please explain the logic you applied in arriving at this conclusion?
It would be interesting to see the entire label. Is there any adornment around the perimeter of the label?
I took a look at the Cozio archive at tarisio.com, and there was no "Edigi Klotz" listed. Many others; but, not Edigi. But, the color of several Kotz examples seen there was similar to the color shown in your images.
I can't get a pic of the entire label through the F hole. There must be a trick to it that I'm missing. There is no adornment around the perimeter of the label. The typeface is consistent with the exception of the 1708 which looks like a different font and aligned differently to the rest of the text. I took a few more pictures...
https://ibb.co/b7VR5Gy
https://ibb.co/pyh5nws
https://ibb.co/wwQGtnr
https://ibb.co/pXWmwkm
That makes sense.
Try taking separate, horizontal photos. That is, see if you can get photos in horizontal slices from top to bottom and display those. That would likely give us enough to visualize the appearance of the entire label.
----------
That possibility occurred to me at the time that I was reviewing the archive. Thanks for making this clarification.
However, I think it is wrong to use the term "fake" with a Markneukirchen violin like this. The maker in no way tried to mislead anyone that this was a Kloz (I mean, they obviously weren't copying one), they just made their violin parts and sold it with the others to the wholesaler, who grabbed his labels and stuck one in. The violin itself looks better than a lot of these dutzendarbeit fiddles, and I have heard/played a few of these that sound and play wonderfully. Some, not so much.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine