Slowik discusses the need for violists to play out in a muscular way, even fairly roughly, even breaking with the written dynamic, at the right time to bring out the line (the audience won't hear a lot of the roughness but they will notice the viola line, which is the poing).
I thought -- this applies as well to 2nd violin. In the very best quartets (Guarneri and Dover both good examples), a strong, steely 2nd and viola are what really defines the quartet's sound. The 1st will rarely have trouble being heard because its E string will cut through -- if anything, 1sts need to avoid overplaying and over-pressing.
But back to viola. In my experience, violists are taught viola bow technique that is all about pressure and intensity and concentrated bow. Violinist are taught more about bow speed instead of pressure, adding air to the bow to produce a round, sweet sound. Sometimes viola playing can benefit from more of a violinist's approach in that way.
What I would add to Slowik is that sometimes it's the other three players who need to break dynamic and lay back and allow the viola (and cello of course) lines to come through without the violist and cellist having to press.
Sometimes what you want from the viola isn't florid intensity or roughness but the opposite -- a gorgeous sweet floating sound, which will only project through a quartet if the other players are sensitive enough to let it do so.
Some of the most beautiful sound a viola can make is at piano, with a lot of bow speed and air and even tilting the bow (some viola teachers used to all but declare bow tilt illegal). And modern strings can make violas play a little more like violins in a good way, with more sweetness.
Finally, Slowik's comments on vibrato should apply to all chamber players. Vibrato, certainly in classical work but even extending to mid-romantic like Brahms, has to be thought of as a special effect, an ornament, and NOT the definition of someone's sound.
That realization is one of the biggest changes that has happened to chamber playing in the last 40 years. So you have a gorgeous vibrato (or, hopefully, a variety of vibrato effects) -- don't use it all the time or your partners and audience get tired of it. Use it more sparingly and it becomes more beautiful and more powerful as an emotional effect.
Tweet
I don’t agree that vibrato is an ornament today, especially with widespread use of synthetic gut strings that sound rather cold without vibrato.
"You are assuming that you can force your viola to do anything you want, the way you can on your violin. But you can't. It won't take as much aggression."
Sounds almost as if the viola is a pet or animal to be treated with respect and the violin isn't! Or the violin has a much tougher trainer! ??
Bowing? Yes the viola needs a heavier bow and a deeper stroke, plus a non-crunching, quasi collé attack even in pianissimo. But the C-string strings needs a shorter, heavier stroke, graduating to a longer, lighter stroke on the A-string. The A has a more "urgent" tone the the violin A, and I personally hate accentuating this with a steel-cored string.
Vibrato? A soloist needs vibrato to "detach" the tone from the surrounding instruments. In a quartet the vibratos should be less intrusive and be subtly variable. Playing with little no vibrato demands subtly varied bow strokes.
Left hand and arm? The wider vibrations of a viola string need greater finger pressure, and a harder "hit" at the start of note, especially in slurred passages. We may use more cello-like fingerings and more mini shifts to allow a supple vibrato and avoid strain. The arm and hand may have to twist and turn as we cross the strings, especially in arpeggios and double stops.
Quartets? A team of soloists! I think of the viola as a violin with 10% cello in it. A blending, transparent sound, alternating with passages of denser strokes nearer the bridge. Lets avoid gruff, dry tones, unless the music demands it. Strong, supple playing?
That said, the violist has to be careful and know when to emphasize its role and, obviously, when to hold back. Learning that is a matter of accumulating experience. I am still learning as a violist. Good luck to all of you who responded to the post.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Miroirs CA Classical Music Journal
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Coltman Chamber Music Competition
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
I remember having a viola lesson not too long after "buying the instrument and learning the clef." I was struggling with tone production and the teacher, himself also both a violinist and violist (and mostly a chamber musician by trade), told me "You are assuming that you can force your viola to do anything you want, the way you can on your violin. But you can't. It won't take as much aggression." I found that counter-intuitive, but after I learned to back off a little I found myself in better control.
As for string quartets, I have now had a fair bit of experience playing both second violin and viola. The second violin is often a close partner or foil to the first violinist and so there is a necessary deference or obeisance. The problem for the violist is that you really CAN blow away the violins if you've got an instrument with some tonal substance, as I have (it's a cannon actually). I find -- and of course I play with other amateurs -- that it comes down to who I'm playing with and I just adjust to that.
I think what you may be saying is that when the composer has given the viola a choice morsel of music, this should be brought out, because the composer must have had an iron-clad reason for doing so. And while that's undoubtedly true, it still has to be tasteful.
Hopefully I didn't misunderstand too badly.