The Dominant in light tension sound nice, but you may not already like their tone, based on your comments.
Of course there are plenty of other lines within brands-just suggesting what I know based on experience and comparing tension numbers on the ones I haven't tried.
https://www.violinstringreview.com/tension-chart.html
I also use the EPG, but they are expensive, and I agree that they don't last long, in particular the A and E
Indeed very annoying, especially for a synthetic, to be so pricey. Definitely not meant for me, as I would rather buy gut strings at that price for the "real" experience.
To be fair, they are not the highest tension strings. But then the Cadenza and some others are lower tension. It becomes a business issue for them-they know their reputation will sell these new strings, based on all their past string set "hits" (Dominant, Infeld Pi, Rondo, Dominant Pro, et.al.) An aluminum D option is thankfully provided-Thomastik tends to do so with many of their lines (very good marketing choice, IMO-options are good.)
I have used Dominant, Infeld Red/Blue, Titanium Solo, and I forget what else in years past, but honestly cannot agree this is fair on the "regular" violinist, unless they lasted years or something, which I *know* they won't because they are not steel or gut strings. Not hating on Thomastik/Infeld. I know violin dealers likely love them-please forgive me for disagreeing with their aggressive pricing scheme.
Buy Perpetual Cadenza at the still expensive price of $100 for a similar concept with even less tension, save $42. Have read that some think Dynamo are like gut. Well, pay less, get real gut strings. Passione are expensive, and so are Oliv-Passione a few bucks over Dynamo, Olive more, but depends on your string choice (rigid/stiff options are hideously more). Eudoxa are $5.00 more than Perpetual Cadenza. Yes, I know "modern" players should not use Eudoxa strings. I disagree, play whatever works for *your situation*. Not being old-school, but it's not necessary to buy every new and expensive product put out as if it must be the best for *yourself*.
BTW, I do have a similar personal "policy" about even gut strings. Passione are fantastic, but I rather pay for Oliv if I am spending over $140 in strings. Nothing against Passione. I would never pay $142 for the Cadenza strings, as much as I love their sound as synthetics-$100 is a lot, but they do deliver on their promise, and last well too.
No offense meant, and I may be the only one with this view in the world-play whatever makes *you* happy. But I feel that by accepting blindly "premium" strings at higher and higher prices, we contribute to the trend-and Thomastik/Infeld will ever be happy to obligue and keep producing a "better" string line at an even higher price.
This is how Thomastik describes the Dynamo sound:
"Their sound will blow away the musician AND the audience."
I will never be convinced of such claims. If you are a good musician, and your audience loves music, they will be "blown away" with even Tonica/Dominant strings.
My current string choice is $177.52-am I an hypocrite? Two are regular (not stiff) Oliv (the G is about 77, the D is $55, expensive) plus a Perpetual Cadenza A and an Oliv mittel E (one can save by making it a Goldbrokat, etc.) These will outlast the Dynamo, and probably sound better together as well-I chose to punish my wallet in this way because of the tone, playability, and what it does for my music playing. But in no way I would pay $177 (in 2023) for any synthetic set in the market, even if all the greatest soloists in the world use it, and Maestro Heifetz himself would approve. I could save by going with Eudoxa, and it would be fine by me too-but the Oliv do last a long while, so they *are* pricey but relatively "reasonable", compared to the most expensive synthetics.
My apologies for my not so positive opinion about a product I have never heard, nor intend to try-"my loss" is your gain, I suppose. I do support your freedom of string choice, and do not believe you must use this or that brand, this or that type of string core, etc. Please do not take my comment personally, and love the strings you do-just as I do myself with my own string choices. Happy practicing to all.
(Mr. Marty, no need to care about strings as some of us do. You can play great music with your more affordable choices. It is self-inflicted wallet-pain, but many of us believe any musical inspiration/ease of play can help a performance in subtle ways even if the audience has no idea of the strings being used. You better play whatever works for you!)
"Especially created for antique violins. Excellent response in all dynamic ranges, including pianissimo. These strings enable older instruments to shine with a natural beauty of sound. They have a brilliant, warm and focused sound despite their lower tension. The Brilliant Vintage set is not intended for baroque instruments with lower tuning."
Warchal offers trial sets of their strings for half-price off of regular price.
In short I'd recommend giving dominant pro a try, especially if you can get a 20 percent off sale on one of the online shops. Right now they have a deal with multiple e strings and an additional D string.
Have you considered the Peter Infeld Reds or Blues? They're great value :D
My violin is rather bright and the Reds are more fun to use for me. They're definitely warmer but the tension is a little higher which preserved the brighter tones. I'm currently on Dominants and a Pirastro Gold Label E. I miss the full Reds set with the chrome E!!!
It’s too bad strings are so expensive, otherwise it would be easier to experiment.
That said I finally landed on PIs and everyone who plays my instrument has switched to PI as well. They feel great under my fingers.
If you use a baroque violin and bow you have to use gut. Using synthetic strings on a baroque or modern setup with a baroque bow (which some people surprisingly do today) cancels out any benefits a baroque bow could offer and is not historically accurate. The baroque bow was engineered to be used with a baroque setup and gut strings, not a violin with a longer neck and synthetic strings. End of rant!
I’ve seen Pirastro Passione mentioned on this site a few times. It is a decent string but it is more of a synthetic string in its composition and sound even though it has a gut core. The best sounding wound gut G and D I have tried has been the Pirastro Oliv. In my opinion the Oliv G and D is much better than Pirastro Eudoxa in every respect. However the Oliv A string is a terrible string and the Eudoxa A is far better in sound and stability.
For unwound plain gut, Aquila strings are a cut above the rest. They use genuine sheep gut, not this faux gut (beef gut) nonsense some other string manufacturers use which isn’t as good.
So with gut (unlike synthetic), it’s important to get a certain type of string, because they aren’t all equal in quality, whereas with synthetic strings, they tend to all be on a more similar level.
But where are these luthiers who have tried all available strings - or even 25 % of them - on the same instrument so they know how a change of strings from one brand to the other will change the sound? When I was using Warchal Ambers I had the violin in for service and my luthier changed the E string because he though there was something wrong with it being all curly! He had never even heard about Warchal strings. And I suspect many will routinely slab a set of the usual Evah Paparazzi or Dominant on violins they have for sale.
Here on v.com you can get the experience of some true violin nerds who have real life experience testing many different string brands on their own instruments in a quest for the "optimal" sound. We can tell you what we experienced when comparing EPG with Oliv, Warchal Brilliant with Larsen Tzigane etc.
And to the OP (here's another broken record): you should try some good gut strings! Oliv G and D (I recommend stiff G and silver D) with Eudoxa A as mentioned by Nate. They also go well with the Perpetual Cadenza A in my recent experience. They look expensive, but will last at least twice as long as the modern synthetics so in fact they are lower cost. Don't listen to people telling you that gut strings have tuning stability issues - they will most often not have tried gut themselves. Once they settle in - which does take a few days longer than the synthetics - they are stable enough to last a rehearsal or concert.
(I do believe in supporting your local luthiers, and definitely mean no ill towards Mr. Tom.)
There is a possibility of the wood shifting a little, and altering the pitch of synthetics. What is so difficult about tuning with your pegs, granted they work properly? Just trying to understand how is it so bad that Oliv (and many other gut strings) can be stable "only" throughout a concert.
For instance, just opened the case and my Olivs were slightly flat. So what? I do not see a problem with that unless the player cannot tune his/her own violin? Not meant as an insult-just do not see a problem that can't be easily solved.
Mr. Bo,
My Oliv G&D are still going strong! I felt the urge to change them because I perhaps "should" last week, but they still sound so good, I am holding on for now. (Using regular Oliv, as stated sometime ago.)
Even without geared pegs, I can assure it's no problem! Of course if you have some wrist/muscle problems, I understand. But if the pegs work, gut strings are more than fine.
Some gut strings do shift a bit as you play, but certainly not all, and if they do, there are workarounds. Now, one can prefer synthetics, and that is fine, as they have their pros. I am so used to gut, that playing synthetics has more cons *for me*-I can instantly recognize the benefits of synthetics-especially when new-but also their limits. My favorite synthetic string set is the Perpetual Cadenza, but I would be lying to myself if I stated that they are better than my current Oliv G&D-though like Mr. Bo, I am currently using the Perpetual Cadenza A, as it matches the Oliv lower strings pretty well, and also has excellent longevity for synthetics.
Those first 8 years were a real battle.
It was the wide variation in venues that worked against gut strings. I also used gut strings when I first started on cello in 1949. The same variation also works against wooden pegs. I now have geared pegs on all my instruments.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Miroirs CA Classical Music Journal
Coltman Chamber Music Competition
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
When I first got the violin I used Pirastro Eudoxas and I thought they were good - but my hearing has weakened a lot (even with hearing aids) in the intervening 70+ years and I prefer the greater power I hear with the EPGs.
Just saying!
EDIT: I previously used the EP Golds with a Peter Infeld Platinum E for several years and liked that very much. I only tried the EPG E string for the first time a month ago after some time with Rondos and then Perpetual Cadenza. That violin is American made (not Italian) but I did have a week to compare it with a modern Cremona-made violin (in home) for a week back in 1974 and the two violins sounded and played identically for me (it was amazing) except my G string was better. So I sent the Italian (Stefano Conia) back to SHAR.