Recently we were contacted by the secretary of a famous artist (I will be deliberately vague here for obvious reasons). The purpose was to ask if we would be interested in having this artist review one of our cases and post the video online. So far, why not?
So we asked what the conditions were, as well as questions like would it be a comparison test? Would other case makers be involved? Standard stuff, just to get the picture.
The answer was, quite frankly, astonishing. To summarize, for $10,000 we would get a good review, for $20,000 a very good review, and for $30,000 a great one.
Two considerations. First, sums like that are available only from deep pocket corporations, not small family businesses, who are thus unfairly excluded from the process. Second, paying for a good review from a famous artist is not only blatantly unethical, but downright deceiving to the buying public as well.
So if you see any rave celebrity reviews online about industrially-made violin cases, caveat emptor!
Tweet
As a 2nd thought, was the agent a legit representative of the famous musician? If so, would the represented musician aware of his/her agent's practice?
@Mr. Musafia: thank you for sharing this experience as most of us, as consumers, are not aware of such practices. This is noble and highlights once again your high moral standards. Warm Regards.
Of course we work with celebrities as well. Joshua Bell, for example is on his third Musafia. But he paid for the first one; when it needed refurbishment we simply gave him a new one for free, and we did that again with his third case.
The difference is we refurbished and sold his first two cases, using all the proceeds to create a fund which offers the Joshua Bell prize in a local music competition for kids (Google "premio Joshua Bell Arisi").
Other companies simply give cases for free to medium- and high-level celebrities with a few conditions like posting it on Facebook and Instagram. I'm friends on Facebook with a lot of them so that's how I know. In a way I think it's cheating a bit but it's not illegal so, OK fine.
One of these soloists told me she used the gifted case for two weeks, got sick of it, and returned her del Gesù to her 15-year-old Musafia (which she paid full price for). I admit that gave me some satisfaction :-)
Sounds like this "review" is really a request for advertisement dollars. We'll promote your product (and ourselves) based on what you're willing to pay. It's something a tennis racquet company desperate for sales might dream of. Let's get a prominent former player to positively "review" our incredible new tennis racquet aimed at the over 60 crowd, even though they wouldn't ever dream of playing with it.
In this age, it’s become a lot more common for people to drum up business by approaching prospective customers online. When you can already pay to manipulate reviews that show up for your business or to get likes on social media or to skew search engine results in your favor, it isn’t surprising that individuals are looking for their own ways to exploit the capabilities and blind spots of the online world.
The offers like the one in the story always sound outlandish because they frequently come from unfamiliar sources and the actual benefits that they afford are often questionable. The more desperate or outlandish the offers, the more hollow they tend to be. It’s especially disappointing if that kind of offer comes from someone who shouldn’t need to make it.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
Thanks for the heads up.