But a few weeks ago a new dimension emerged in my violin-playing. The organist at church where I sing in the choir invited me to accompany the organ and choir in some hymns. So, not wanting to disturb my pair of "baroque" violins, I went out to the local Sam Ash store and, after tuning all 8 of their used violins, selected a Scott Cao student violin that I judged to sound the best in the store. I paid $310 plus tax, and added a set of Tonica strings and tuned them to A=440, which is how I've been playing my "church violin" since the first day, about 6 weeks now. This is the first time I've played for a real audience, a challenge I've needed to take me into new growth as a musician, but also requiring I rethink my practice and goals to focus on best possible tone and intonation of simpler music, rather than privately hacking away at "harder" music in my lonely room.
Although my experience so far tells me gut strings sound best, I intend to stay with synthetics on my church violin because I need stability when I take my violin out of my house and open the case in the new temperature and humidity of the church on Sunday mornings. I do not want to blame my instrument or strings for my own weaknesses in technique, but still I of course do want the best set-up I can afford from which to execute my slowly-improving skills. And since I've been dissatisfied with my sound on the church violin so far, and under the inspiration of a review published on this website in the blog section, I gambled over $100 on a set of Evah Pirazzi strings, to be delivered in the next few days. My first set of premium synthetic strings!
That's the background from which I finally launch my discussion question: might there be any degradation of those Evah Pirazzi strings if I move them back and forth between 2 different violins? I want to compare the sound effects from swapping them out from the Tonicas on my church violin AND from the guts on my Chicago violin. I will do the experiment at 440 on both instruments. My purpose is to discern whether my Chicago violin produces a noticeably better sound than my Cao church violin with the Evah Pirazzis. If so, I am willing to lose a baroque violin and convert it to a 440 church violin in order to present the best sound possible for the only audience I've ever had. But if not, I will want to put the Evahs back on the Cao violin to thereby be confirmed as my "church violin," and put on my Chicago violin a nice new set of Italian gut strings imported directly from the very small maker by a dealer I met at the Viola da Gamba Society 2022 Conclave. Very fine gut strings!
And if all that happens, will my Evah Pirazzi strings sound just as good back on my Cao church violin as they did the first time I put them there? Will moving the strings back and forth between 2 instruments do anything bad to them?Tweet
Also, in transferring a string from one fiddle to another, the bending & gripping at the nut and the bridge may not kink the string at the same places.
That's quite the transition from gut to Evah Pirazzi. I'd love to hear more of your impressions of the difference!
I think it is important to be sure that the VSLs of both violins are identical so the strings fit both instruments the same to avoid damage that might otherwise occur.
"Fatigue" defined as weakness caused by repeated variations in stress, in this case, repeatedly slackening the strings and then stretching them back to pitch.
I went through that process as stupidly as I could, starting by ordering loop-end instead of ball end. I did that out of forgetting about the fine tuners, being so used to the plain-hole tailpieces on my other 2 violins. I always tie my own knots with the gut strings so I thought of loop-end as a new convenience. I was 3/4 lucky in the sense that only the E string had a loop while the other 3 were still ball-end. There are 4 fine tuners on this violin, and they want ball-ends. When I got to the E string, I improvised by slipping the loop around one of the two upward protrusions of the fine tuner (the slot between them is where I was supposed to slip the string so the ball would catch inside). I guess it works, but I hope I'm not distorting the tuner by putting all the stress on only one side, and therefore also a little off-center too.
And speaking of that stress on the tuner, it seems to me that bringing these strings up to pitch requires they are pulled to a higher tension than I'm used to! It actually feels dangerous, I hope none ever snap apart in my face! In that sense, these strings are a little frightening ! And as I was re-tightening them in the first hour (still stretching...) I was startled when the bridge tipped over towards the fingerboard and was slammed into the top of the instrument! I am amazed the force didn't crack the wood (or drop the soundpost)! So after loosening the pegs and standing the bridge back up, I paid a lot more attention to the bridge perpendicularity and avoided any gaps under the feet of it. I was surprised at how slick the violin top felt, how much the bridge wanted to skate as I tightened the strings again.
I've only had a little playing time on the new strings, and they weren't yet stable, requiring frequent tightening to return to pitch. They are indeed loud, something which I read about in reviews. I do not like the metal E string, I got some silent and some squeeky bows across it, reminding me of something I hated about metal E strings before I switched to gut about 7 years ago when I was still in my first year. Probably the Tonica E was metal too? I never noticed in the few weeks I had them, but whatever it was I never squeeked or ghosted it like the Evah E string.
Already I learned a lot from this experience, and as I get used to these new strings I'm sure I'll form an opinion about their sound and playability. So far my lessons taken are mostly mechanical: buy ball-end strings for this violin, watch the bridge when tightening, be careful how I bow a metal E string. I think my gut strings have been much lower tension, and probably the Tonicas were too, since I hadn't even thought about that until I was bringing these strings up to pitch. I once tried light gauge gut strings on one of my other violins, but didn't like the sound. And my first time with guts, I ordered bare (no metal windings) heavy gauge, but the G string was so fat (a Gamut "pistoy" of, I think, 3 strands braided like a rope) and sounded like a sick goat (perhaps my low skills contributed to the problem). So I have otherwise always ordered medium gauge strings, and that's what these Evah's are too. Maybe they'd feel less threatening (ie, require less tension) if they were light gauge, but I won't be able to to do another $100+ string experiment very soon.
So over the next few weeks I will be getting to know these strange and exotic new strings, maybe a bit like trying new race car tires on my old compact car.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Thomastik-Infeld's Dynamo Strings
Violinist.com Summer Music Programs Directory
ARIA International Summer Academy
Johnson String Instrument/Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine