After initial self-practice (Suzuki book with youtube videos), it became clear that I need a teacher. But, it was almost impossible to find a western classical music teacher around me. However, there were several good violin teachers for Indian classical music. So, I joined a teacher (for Indian Classical) who is very good and am with him for about 6 months now. And I have decided to devote first 1-2 years to Indian classical music before finally shifting to western classical music.
Violin techniques have evolved in India to suit traditional Indian style and it is played very differently, from the style of holding the violin to the tuning of strings (G#-C#-G#-C# instead of G-D-A-E).
After the long introduction, here are my questions:
1. To keep playing pieces from suzuki books and other western pieces, I usually transpose the pieces to either C#-major (for D-major) or F#-major (for G-major). This keeps the fingering on middle two strings same. Is this ok to do?
2. Is my decision to stay with Indian classical for 1-2 years before switching to western classical a meaningful one? Will it be very hard to make a switch later?
Any help, suggestions, comments will be helpful. Thank you all in advance.
Charu
PS: I am very serious about this hobby and I practice more than two hours every day.
Tweet
For one student, the Indian teacher had her on a bigger violin than I thought suitable for western style. She ended up with two violins, maintaining both tunings separately. I don't know what happens to strings that are frequently tuned and held at other pitches. There is scordatura in western playing, at least, so maybe someone else can comment.
My impression is that changing/adding western classical to a foundation of Indian learning would be similar to toggling between violin/viola/cello or within other families of related instruments. Some aspects will be easier or harder than others but with good guidance and determination, it can be done.
How about considering a western classical violin teacher online? Many are doing that these days.
I find the suggestion of keeping genres completely separate by Joel very insightful. I think I will also allot separate the practice days. Now that I have already started with Indian style, I don't want to leave that halfway through, so maybe two days a week, I will practice pieces from books like Suzuki volumes.
I am a professor of physics at the Indian Institute of Technology. We, too, have temporarily shifted to online teaching, but nobody, neither teachers nor students are happy. And especially with music, I think online learning is much more difficult.
Any other insight will be very helpful. Thanks again.
As a classical teacher and observing what carnatic violinists do while sitting and playing with violin towards the floor, I'm always amazed at the flexibility in which a violin can imitate so many different types of ethnic music, yet with classical training, one can also attempt to branch out to experience rich cultural world music that in itself has varying technique that one has to apply to truly get the nuance and language of it. Jazz for instance is this way, not every classical player can apply their technical skills to truly get the feel of that style and language, that has a world of its own too.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Violinist.com Business Directory
Violinist.com Guide to Online Learning
ARIA International Summer Academy
Johnson String Instrument and Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
If you can read music, it would just be a case of re learning where the notes are on the fingerboard, I honestly dont see a problem, but I am no expert by any stretch of the imagination.