Now my students are asking me how to create that vibrato sound themselves. I know that the "Nike Slogan" (just do it) will not satisfy them.
Perhaps it is time to ask another teacher to assist. Maybe it is time for them to move-on but I still have stuff I want to teach them.
Your thoughts will be appreciated.
Tweet
I came in with a wonky and stiff arm vibrato when I started working with my teacher. She insisted on teaching me a wrist vibrato, believing arm vibratos to tend towards the inherently tense. I think Flesch has some thinking along those same lines.
Besides the particulars of the technique, she took a stance of insisting that my vibrato be relaxed at all times, and would point out during lessons when I was using a stiff vibrato, and point me towards the sound of a relaxed vibrato, rather than just claiming that this was based on what she was seeing me do. She would also point out things like me cutting the vibrato early on notes, and insisting that I vibrate through the length of the note. She would also ask me for different intensities of vibrato in terms of expression.
Basically, she pointed my ears in the right direction, and over time, I have internalized the idea that my vibrato must be as relaxed as possible, and I have been able to form a mental representation of this and mold it by having it consistently insisted on and brought to mind in my lessons. It's a long and ongoing process, but at this point, I have the awareness to be able to do my own work on it without needing the prompting and pointing out, which I think is your goal for any student you may have.
I think Sandy seems to have a congruent conception.
I don't think that it's something that "just happens" for most students. (If you look around YouTube, you can see just how much of a hash most autodidacting learners make of the technique.)
The player needs a correctly-configured left hand -- relaxed, stable, neutrally relaxed. Then try Simon Fischer's exercises for developing vibrato.
Lydia, if one has good bases (you've just listed a few) and a teacher who explains, demonstrates and gives advice, it will naturally happen for many students.
Menuhin's Six Lessons gives but one tiny paragraph to vibrato, but his minute analysis and integration of every other gesture can enable anyone to master and improve it.
"Learning vibrato.
To start with, I teach a forearm movement, but with a flexible wrist and fingers: the elbow leads the wrist which leads the knuckles which lead the fingertips. Visually, the effect is rather like an underwater plant, waving to and fro in a gentle current. As the motion speeds up, the hand vibrates a little more than the forearm, but something is still happening in the elbow. The fingers stay slightly passive, but tonic enough not to slip.
My "underwater plant" motion is mainly to find that subtle synthesis of tonus and flexibilty. For a faster, maybe narrower vibrato, my "plant" get a little stiffer, but only just enough.
I have never practiced a "finger" vibrato as such, so I am still learning! But in the highest postions, when the whole hand is leaning over the violin's shoulder, my vibrato is more vertical than along-the-string; up there it has to be narrower anyway.
Depending on the student, the weather etc, I find I can choose between an "analytical approach", mastering individual elemets separately before combining them; and progressvely refining global movements in a "combo" (Gestalt?) approach.
I hasten to add that my wave-motions are done without the bow to begin with!
I have had a few students who have found a beautiful vibrato on their own: my approach tries to give the others this possibility.
I'll try to describe briefly what I do:
- Pressure Zero. One finger on each string; minimal or no contact between the base of the index and the neck; no pressure; a gentle back & forth shifting/sliding motion.
- Pressure No 1. Slight finger pressure with equally slight thumb counter-pressure; the strings descend halfway to the fingerboard. .
- Pressure No 2, a little more pressure; the strings arrive on the fingerboard, the fingertips drag more on the strings; as the forearm approaches, the hand leans back and the fingers curl; as the forearm recedes, the hand leans forewards and the fingers stretch.
- Pressure No 3, only just enough to stop the fingertips sliding; the complex motions of Pressure No 2 have become a combined arm & hand vibrato, with equal pressure from all 4 flexible fingers.
The only risk is increasing the finger pressure (and thumb counter-pressure) to Nos 4,5,6 etc without realising.
Excess tension, e.g. from the middle finger, or from the thumb, will block the wrist and stiffen the whole process.
It usually works!
Hope this is comprehensible...
PS
Concerning the "patting head & rubbing tummy" syndrome I have found that on long bowed note, the student's right arm wants to join in the vibrato when both elbows have a similar opening (usually mid-bow). This is normal: when we hold something in both hands, (e.g. a tray of drinks) they work in perfect sychronisation.
I try a de-sync exercise: a quick flapping motion in one hand, plus a long, slow arc in the other arm, so slow, that one can keep an eye on both sides at once."
Then I played in a "mixed recital" and one of the teachers there (not my teacher) took me aside and said, "Paul your vibrato is very thin. You should work on that." I must have given him a very puzzled look because he said, "You may feel like you're doing a lot with your hand, but nobody can hear it."
At my next lesson I asked my teacher about it, and he smiled, and he sighed, and he told me to stop doing vibrato entirely for a few weeks, and then he would rebuild it. Sure enough, I was assigned the same kind of exercises Ingrid described, and then "vibrato pieces" like "Ave Maria", and so forth. Now people can hear it.
My teacher does wrist vibrato with all his students first, simply because it usually is not the most obvious, but it's also probably the most versatile, and he wants them to get it right while they are (mostly) still very young. My daughter was also taught vibrato by him, without any wing-flapping or tummy-rubbing. Arm vibrato was introduced at least three years later.
My son's Suzuki program recital was full of Waltz-playing young'uns wobbling their way through. :-)
I think teachers realized that it didn’t work to suddenly add vibrato and shifting (and back in the day-note reading) all at once in book 4. I also find early book 2 is when a lot of students start noticing and wanting to do vibrato, so I’d prefer to guide them rather than them end up with bad habits.
I then quit lessons and playing until I was about 13, when I resumed with a vengeance. My father was an avid amateur violinist and I asked him to show me how to do vibrato. He gave me the same arm-vibrato exercise that Ingrid described above. It took about a month before I could apply it in a practical way to my music making. It served me well and I soon became concertmaster of my high school orchestra for 3 years and years later I became CM of our community orchestra for 20 years. Actually everything I learned beyond 3rd position I taught myself. I guess it served me well, because by the time I was 16 I had done pretty well - I was into my 2nd year as HS concertmaster and had a number of concertos worked up to some level (even if never performed: Bach A minor, Mozart 3 & 5, Mendelssohn and Beethoven and was working on the last "half" of Bach's 2nd Partita). Apparently those 2 years at MSM were not completely wasted.
I followed that same method for teaching vibrato during the 40 years that I taught violin lessons, but also added teaching a wrist vibrato by starting in 3rd position with the wrist against the shoulder - as Ingrid described (for 4th position). I never taught any student beyond the two Mozart concertos in the Suzuki books, although I did teach some chamber music for a student that was in a high school chamber music program - after she had finished those Mozarts.
After I sustained a neck injury at age 55 that paralyzed parts of my left arm and hand for a year I completely lost my arm vibrato. I had to stop playing violin for a year, and even lost my cello vibrato for most of that time. I've been working on wrist and finger vibrato ever since (that's been 30 years) and while it is not where I want it to be it comes partly alive about 30 minutes after each playing session starts. For some strange reason it seems to work better on viola than violin. My cello arm vibrato is close to where it used to be (but cello vibrato, like guitar vibrato, is notoriously more ergonomic than violin).
I don't see any reason why any musician can't teach others what they have self-learned.
I sought out some online training on how to teach vibrato online and set up a vibrato class that was attended seriously by six early book 2 to early 4 students. We met masterclass-style 3-4x/week for 2 months for instruction (using descriptions, demonstrations, and props) and supervised practice. As many have mentioned, it takes trying it out until it clicks, but I didn't want students to experiment too much when I can't course-correct them with physical guidance. By meeting basically every other day, I could enforce practicing and nip errant ways quickly.
After the 2-month vibrato intensive, we reduced group practice to once a week. I used the time for a book 1 reading intensive but in January we'll flip back. Two of the original vibrato 6 are considered graduated, so the remaining 4 will continue, as well as a few who had not joined the first round (but not the 6yo in book 2 - I'm asking them to wait). The irony is that when close contact lessons resume, I'll be much more experienced teaching vibrato online than physically.
Cello vibrato is another story. I'm self-taught, well aware of my limitations, and would prefer that a proper cellist take on my student (not happening yet for various reasons). So far I merely prevent my student from doing things that seem suspicious to my string player sensibilities.
Vibrato seems individual enough that, as long as you know a few basic exercises, teaching it is mostly about preventing bad habits from developing.
This isn't about the techniques you are teaching. It is about communicating in a teaching, training, coaching, or other helping role.
I would avoid the term "try" as much as possible (as in "try this," or "try doing it this way"). To "try" to do something implies 1) it will be difficult, and 2) the person may fail.
Instead, look at how I started this post: "May I make a suggestion?"
With this phrase, you are actually asking the person's permission to tell them what to do. This is polite and communicates a desire to help. The person is likely to say "yes," and be open to what you have to say. And, there is the clear implication that you know exactly what you are talking about.
Then, you can be comfortably definite: "Do it this way...."
That phrase ("May I make a suggestion?") is wonderful not only in a teaching role, but also for use in work and interpersonal situations (especially with family or friends). Just make sure not to over-use it. Use it for the tough stuff.
Cheers,
Sandy
However, I disagree that the phrase is genuinely asking for someone’s permission, at least as it's used in social situations. For many people, “May I make a suggestion?” is a rhetorical question whose only acceptable answer is, “Yes,” unless you want a confrontation.
As a teacher, if you ask that in a lesson, then be prepared to switch to an alternate phrasing and not be offended in case a student replies, “No.” Some younger children or students with certain personalities may take things literally. They may sincerely not feel ready for more suggestions that day (overwhelmed with too many things, having a bad day).
For what it’s worth, I once saw someone politely answer “No, thank you” to that question in a social situation. The questioner, a stranger, transformed immediately from friendly to enraged, and screamed at the respondent.
But the phrase does have a place, but (yes) not if it's a command disguised as a verbal "ploy" with a lot of anger behind it. But when and where it is genuine and fits the situation, it does the job.
And in fact, if it is a situation where "no" is or may be expected, then no other response is necessary on your part, because the other person is not likely to be convinced by anything you would say anyway.
But my preference would be to still eliminate "Try this..." and instead simply say "Do it this way..." You can then respond with a "Good try.." or something similar.
Sandy
The trick is to let the student know that their is NO mysterious, secret way to impart this knowledge such as the following:
"Whether in singing or in life, we can glorify God only by yielding to His Spirit (1 Thessalonians 5:19; Ephesians 4:30). We must allow our being to be filled with His presence as naturally as we allow our lungs to fill with air. If we push or strain, we are exerting our own will against His natural flow, just as oversinging leads to harshness rather than beauty."
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Violinist.com Business Directory
Violinist.com Guide to Online Learning
ARIA International Summer Academy
Johnson String Instrument and Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine
I also remember one thing that really helped me get there was practicing the movement on a table, like as if you're doing violin vibrato on a piano.
I think vibrato isn't something to be "taught", but rather something to be discovered. You must offer guidance.