I had so much fun that after a few months I bought my own little viola from a violin shop. It's a Peccard "VA-8" made in 2006 from West Coast Strings:
https://www.westcoaststring.com/violas/va8.html
It's just a student level instrument but it has very nice wood and a good setup. It's strung with Helicore mediums. The C string is a little soft and unfocused but overall it's much more playable than the old Sherl & Roth rental. My teacher played it and liked it a lot (or maybe she was just being nice?) It doesn't sound like a great huge viola but I don't expect it to. At least I have a high A under my ear instead of a high E ;-)
The shop where I bought it had several 14" violas. One from the 1850s was lovely but way above my budget. Some were obviously poor quality. Of the four Peccards, three sounded harsh, boomy, hollow. One sounded pleasant, if not as loud. The shop owner (a luthier) played them for me so that I could hear them from across the room. Again, three made me cringe; one was sweet. It was just so different; it seemed like a fluke.
I bought it, in my ignorance paying over 3x more for this instrument than it retails for elsewhere, but I didn't learn that until much later. While I regret overpaying so much, I rationalized that the shop has overhead and if I had bought the viola off the internet it might have sounded awful like those other ones.
All was going great until a few months later when my health failed. I had to put my viola away until recently. I'm much better now and happily playing again. Started over from the beginning, page one.
Here's the embarrassing part: IT'S NOT A VIOLA!
I was reading here, trying to find ideas for my C string. Came across a discussion about violins and violas and dimensions of various instruments. Measured mine just to scratch the itch of curiosity. The ribs are only 30 mm. Shouldn't they be taller?
I called West Coast Strings to ask them what makes this a viola and not a violin. The woman said it's a mistake. The ribs should definitely be 35 mm. Without seeing it herself she can't say for certain what happened, but this is likely a violin (V-8) mis-labelled as a viola (VA-8).
That would explain why it sounded so different from the other violas of the same size and make.
I didn't buy my "viola" off the internet or from a generic music store. I bought it from a dedicated violin shop; from a luthier, no less. Am I wrong to think he should have noticed that the ribs were too short to be a viola?
Everyone says that a violin strung like a viola is NOT a viola, but apparently this is what I have. I don't know what to do. If this happened to one of your students, what would you suggest?
Sorry this was so long. If you made it this far, thank you for your time.
Tweet
I agree with Lyndon. If you like the sound, it's fine. And the thickness of a "real" viola does make it more awkward to hold. So you might as well continue to learn on this one, and later if you want to transition to a "real" viola you'll be making the same step that many violinists do, quite successfully, instrument-wise.
https://maestronet.com/forum/index.php?/topic/346730-is-it-a-big-violin-or-a-14inch-viola/page/4/
Unfortunately the discussion then degenerated into a spat about whether all dealers are crooks...
Second, is the shop where you originally bought the instrument still open?
Once we're back in a mask-free world I'm going to take my "viola" back to the shop just to show the owner and ask him what he thinks.
I am really annoyed at the mark-up I paid. I "get" retail. I was in retail myself for many years. But this was excessive IMO. Even the woman at West Coast Strings was appalled at what I paid. I don't expect the owner to give me any money back, but I just want to tell him. If he's willing to exchange it and has something I like better, I'll consider it.
================================
The odds of me finding a really good, rich-sounding viola at this size are very slim, and physically I'm unable to go bigger. I've thought about Shar's Carlo Lorenzo or even the Sabatier. But rather than buying a new instrument someday that might be only marginally better due to the limitations of physics, one idea I'm toying with is that "Hole in the Heart" surgery on the top plate.
There is a luthier in Bellingham, WA who is experienced in this procedure. She's only ever done it on fractional violins. She's never done it with a 14" but said it should work well to give it more bass, clarity and volume. The big downside is if the results aren't good, it's irreversible. But if the results ARE good, I would have something that actually sounds like a viola instead of like a violin with a C string.
There was a discussion about this at fiddlerman.com :
"For those with an interest, check out the December 2000 Strad Magazine article entitled: “Too Small to be Beautiful?” starting on page 1350. The “dark horse” 60£ Chinese fractional violins with the 35£ hole in the heart modification kicked butt against Sabatier amoeba-shaped violas and Tertis viola clones (among others) in a blind sound test with 60 music teachers and makers. All entrants used donated Corelli Crystal strings."
https://fiddlerman.com/forum/breakroom/anyone-have-december-2000-strad-magazine/#p96989
"... The article is entitled “Too Small to be Beautiful?” starting on page 1350. The Sabatier viola did not fare well. Clones of the Tertis viola were not that well received either. The “dark horse” 60£ Chinese violins with the 35£ hole in the heart modification kicked butt. All of the entrants were fitted with donated Corelli Crystal strings. It was the funniest Consumer Report style article I have ever read."
=====================
But OMG it looks scary!
https://fiddlerman.com/forum/fiddle-violin-repair-making-and-set-up/hole-in-heart-fractional-viola/
She also suggested trying Tonica strings before trying surgery. That I can do! I don't know how to change the strings myself, but I've ordered a set of Tonicas.
https://maestronet.com/forum/index.php?/topic/322973-through-the-heart-viola/
https://maestronet.com/forum/index.php?/topic/322456-thru-the-top-soundpost/
There are so many things in the fiddle world which have claimed to kick butt at one time or another, only to fade into obscurity.
My "viola" was new when I bought it, not used. I'm only doing this for fun, to make some noise in a too-quiet house and maybe keep my brain from going senile as I get older. I love the process of learning, but will probably never play for anyone but myself and the cats. And I just like the viola more than violin.
When I was a child I was forced into guitar lessons. My brother was a musical prodigy (drums) and mom needed to park me somewhere while the genius was in lessons. She signed me up for guitar. I was awful, the "GSO" was awful; it made my fingers bleed. I HATED it. Quit as soon as I could. Didn't pick up another instrument until I was in my 50's when I picked up that little rental viola. I loved it immediately.
There are no words for how much fun I'm having. This is WAY more complicated than guitar. So many moving parts to attend at the same time. It's like riding dressage compared to western saddle.
Of course, I am assuming the label is authentic and placed in the instrument by West Coast Strings.
A few things immediately jump out when you read and click around on the site: It is sprinkled with typos (e.g. "accesories") and grammatical errors ("It's wonderful viola at very reasonable price.").
This does not look like the presentation of an organization with attention to detail.
However: There is no mention of size but they claim to have fractionals for this model all the way down to 1/16. Given that fractionals are for smaller size people it would seem reasonable to reduce all dimensions of the instrument when sizing a fractional, so maybe it is legitimate that a fractional viola would be just about the size of a violin all around. If I remember correctly the ribs on the 3/4 violin I started out on were less than the 4/4 my parents eventually bought for me.
Edit: "cussed" in the first paragraph should read "discussed". I wonder if I typed it that way or if there was some other typo and the spell checker came up with this creative correction.
It’s not uncommon for violins to be restrung and passed off as fractional violas. Some of them are selected because they sound better strung as violas.
That said, even well known dealers like Kenneth Warren and Sons have had to settle lawsuits against them for such practices of price gouging, and inflating appraisals. For your sake and the next person’s, I hope that you do ask for a refund or suggest you’ll write a review of West Coast exposing their sales tactics. If mentioning you’ve asked for advice here, doesn’t give them incentive to make it right, I hope this post is a warning to others to avoid buying from West Coast.
While I’m not a violist, I did get a chance to hear and play a fractional V. Richelieu viola at a music conference last summer from Claire Givens,a dealer out of Minnesota. It truly sounded like a viola, and had the proportions. I was surprised at the price for the sound, but it may have been promotional - Claire had just invested in a sizeable amount of Richelieu inventory. I believe the violas actually come out of the Vermont Violin shop. One of the three shops listed can probably ship you a few for a trial. Here is more information on them.
https://www.vrichelieu.com/fractional-instruments
And a list of dealers who carry them:
https://www.vrichelieu.com/partners
Good luck!
I agree with Lyndon... if the low ribs work better that what the specs say they should be, I wouldn't bother to argue. For the violas I build, I use much shorter ribs than "standard", and I think it works just fine.
Website typos and grammatical errors seems extremely common where most of the workers are Chinese, but I wouldn't necessarily say that those errors alone mean much about their business practices or products.
With regards to West Coast Sound's sales tactics, I'm more upset with the local dealer. I think the violin was mis-labeled at the factory by accident, but the local luthier who played it and sold it to me should have known better. I understand what Lyndon and others are saying, that if it works, it works, and I might just keep it, but taking into account that it was also egregiously overpriced, I feel like I was gouged. However, they're just about the only game in town for repairs and such, so I can't afford to offend them.
Decided not do the 'Hole in the Heart'. I don't want to take the chance of ruining what I've got. There's just something about the way it looks that makes me feel sad for the instrument...
Conceptually, the V. Richelieu viola is exactly what I've been looking for: A purposefully made, acoustically optimized small viola. Thank you, Jane, for those links!
In the meantime, can anyone suggest a C string to try? It currently has Helicore mediums and I've ordered a set of Tonicas. Thomastik makes a Vision C that would fit. Any idea how that would compare to the Helicore C? Any other suggestions?
Thanks again!
Getting back to the subject in hand, the Eudoxa G on my violin has a good solid tone, which makes me wonder if it had ever been used as a viola. It has been in my family since 1850 and there is no evidence of its use as a viola. Except ... a few weeks ago I had the original ebony pegs seen to. The small ends were projecting too far beyond the pegbox, thereby placing the string holes in the wrong location, making tuning by peg more awkward. My luthier shortened the pegs by about 1/4" and drilled new string holes in the correct positions, thereby curing the tuning problems. When I returned home I changed the D and G strings and while doing so noticed that the old string hole in the G peg was significantly larger than it need be, as if it had been drilled a very long time ago to take a viola C. Next time I visit my luthier I'll ask him out of curiosity if the violin would work as an effective small viola - not that I have any intention of using it as such.
Could it have been drilled to accommodate an unwound gut G-string?
Edited to mention that I use the Vision "C" short scale string.
That's very encouraging to hear about your viola. Seems like most people think it can't be done, and I bet you're a lot more comfortable than the other players in your section.
I tend to doubt that this one has had any special post-factory treatment besides perhaps a soundpost adjustment but I'm going to ask the luthier about it when I go back there. Perhaps some adjustments like yours had could improve the low end on this instrument, too.
Thank you for the Vision C rec. That's two, now. I'm going to try a Vision C with my Helicores, and also a full set of Tonicas to see which I like better. May I ask what your other strings are?
I hesitated to tell the board how much my viola normally retails for. With all the great players here and their expensive instruments, it's embarrassing. Makes it sound like a VSO, but honestly it isn't. It has blocks and inlaid purfling. Ebony pegs that fit and a well-carved ebony fingerboard. Good aged spruce and flamed maple. Nice varnish. Good tailpiece. It rings. Fundamentally, it's a well-made workshop instrument.
BTW for a 14" (or less) viola, I choose a high tension C-string, and violin G, D, & A, to have sufficient tension .
Adrian, may I ask specifically what high tension C-string you use? Do you use the violin G-D-A of the same make, or something different? Krista has recommended Vision short scale C, Vision G & D, and a Larsen A. Understanding that every instrument is different, I'd be interested in your experience as well.
I just switched from Helicore to Tonicas and like them very much. I like the Tonica C better than Helicore's.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Dimitri Musafia, Master Maker of Violin and Viola Cases
Violinist.com Business Directory
Violinist.com Guide to Online Learning
ARIA International Summer Academy
Johnson String Instrument and Carriage House Violins
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 1, with introduction by Hilary Hahn
Violinist.com Interviews Volume 2, with introduction by Rachel Barton Pine