Which concerto movement is the most technically difficult?
I was wondering which of the concerto movements would you consider the most technically difficult:
- Bruch Violin Concerto No. 1 (3rd movt)
- Lalo Symphonie Espagnole (1st movt)
- Wieniawski Violin Concerto No. 2 ( 1st movt)
Thanks in advance!
Of those three, the 3rd movement of the Bruch, which is much harder than the first two movements.
I agree with Mary Ellen. Lalo I < Wieniawski 2/I < Bruch 1/III.
Definitely the Bruch with all the double stops at the beginning -- hard to get in tune. Lalo is the easiest technically but can be more challenging musically. Wieniawski is a bit of both -- some technical challenges, some musical challenges.
Thanks all for your input! I suspected that Bruch was the most difficult too!
What I don't understand, then, is why Bruch is often learnt first before Wieniawski and Lalo?
The first movement is. the last is a lot harder than the firet
I agree with Mary and Lydia! played all 3 and the Bruch last movement is by far the most difficult. Those thirds LOL
I learned them in these order:
It wasn't (only) the thirds that I found tough in the Bruch...it was getting the triplet string crossings smooth, contrasting with the dotted rhythms and up to tempo that did it for me!
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.