Practice mute trouble
I recently bought a big rubber practice mute. I noticed when reading customer reviews (not just for the one I bought) that some customers found a huge reduction in sound intensity while others claimed there was no effect whatsoever. That struck me as weird.
I bought one anyway and tried it out. Under my ears it seems to me to be quite effective though less than I had hoped. However my wife--for whose comfort I bought the mute--says there is no difference between me playing with it on or off.
So: is the effect of a mute depending on listener's ears or what is going on here?
I am afraid to use a metal mute. Any other advice?
I would recommend not using a metal mute as that could potentially damage your bridge. I think it depends on a the volume of your violin and b the distance of the instrument to your wife. That seems to be the 2 things that affect my practise mute
Try the Artino mute. It's metal with a rubber outer layer.
Get some earplugs. Then you won't hear your violin or your wife complaining.
Your wife might have a point, though I'm not taking her side. I'd recommend downloading a dB meter app to your cell phone. There's many to choose from, and the one I have works well. Then you can experiment. I've found that many mutes dramatically affect the violin's timbre, and seem to drop the volume significantly from the player's point of view, but drop the actual dB output surprisingly little. And it becomes very easy to make up the muted difference with more aggressive bowing, which I seem to almost automatically do. The really heavy practice mutes, like the nickel plated brass ones or the Artino, drop the volume the most, but the sound is so stilted that it's almost not worth doing anymore. (And just as a side note, if you have an "Ultra" practice mute or clone of same, I have to tell you that I personally can't stand the sound of that one.) So what's to be done? I'm not sure, except to get the dB meter app and go from there. You could ask your wife to wear the earplugs. It's not so much to ask.
There's not much choice - you need mass to reduce the vibration. A metal mute will (generally be much heavier and therefore) reduce the volume much more than an Artino which will do much more than a plain rubber mute. If you can get by with an Artino, that would be preferred as it would have less impact on the sound and probably fit more securely and gently on the bridge.
The reason it's not different for your wife is because she can still hear something. You can safely conclude that her opinion of your violin playing is binary. Playing the violin = bad. Not playing the violin = good. Buy some lumber and some fiberglass insulation and build yourself an insulated practice booth.
I believe I'm something of a connoisseur of practice mutes. I own a rubber one,a WMute, an Artino and
Tony, the danger with the nickel plated brass mutes like the one you linked to isn't that they can damage your bridge. It's that they can vibrate loose, fall off, and damage your violin top. I'm happy to hear that you haven't had that problem, but some people have. Be careful.
Mark - the mute is very heavy and around 4mm of the bridge are inside the mute when it is fitted. To vibrate loose would require enormous acoustic energy. Far more than a violin can produce.
For practice purposes a couple of clothes pegs borrowed from the wife work fine. They are also ideal for holding sheet music in place on the stand in breezy outdoor conditions.
I have 3 practice mutes: a heavy metal mute, a rubber mute and a leather mute. The heavy metal mute is the best at muting my sound; the leather mutes less, but gives the most pleasant tone (Google Leathermutes). The rubber mute is in between.
I've been using a brass practice mute for 30 years without damaging bridge or top.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.