When bows are put into storage, why do some people insist on cutting the hair out of them? Although I wouldn't normally buy a bow on the internet, the number of hairless bows which I see advertised for sale there is legion. I appreciate that mutilating bows in this fashion may have something to do with preventing the hair from being eaten by bugs, but IMO one ought to weigh the possibility of hair-eating bugs against the certainty of the buyer having to pay to have the bow re-haired (which also lessens the likelihood and price of a sale). If I weren't made of sterner stuff I'd describe the sight of all those mutilated bows as heartbreaking.
This discussion has been archived and is no longer accepting responses.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.