October 16, 2010 at 6:12 AM
I'm talking about building good technique.
Some people swear by scales, and I know at least one who believes etudes are the answer. "Review" is a Suzuki mantra for keeping old pieces alive and well, and that also builds technique. Then there's the challenge of something new.
A diet of all these things might be the best way. Which do you think is the most effective ingredient for building a sound technique?
I voted ALL OF THE ABOVE. Random thoughts right off:
Scales help me keep in shape. Ditto for shifting, double-stops, and Sevcik-type finger exercises.
Etudes help me to keep focused on expressiveness and musicality.
New pieces help me stretch my mental muscles and keep me from getting into a comfortable rut.
Review helps me see where the technique has matured and where old problems have disappeared or are in process of disappearing.
My practice sessions are about 2 parts of technique to 1 part of repertoire. I know that may sound a little out of balance to some, but I get a lot of fun out of technical stuff. One thing I like to do is intersperse periods of technical drill with pure pleasure-playing; this helps my endurance.
I voted “all of the above”, and I missed Šev?ík. Fun vote, again!
Petition to management: please make it possible to spell Šev?ík correctly on Violinist.com .
Jim, thanks for sharing your method. They inspire this new amateur violinist.
For some reason I only saw the poll, I couldn't see a way to vote. Does that mean my vote went on automatically?
Not that it really matters since I agree with the outcome, its just a bit odd...
All of the above are valuable for technique it's true, but in terms of the BEST way, I voted for scales. I believe that scales are the primary building block of left hand technique.
something got reset because I just got to vote. I went for all of the above (assuming of course that it meant all of the below, cause there wasn't anything above cept a title!).
This subject has been more on my mind than other weekend votes. Is it common these days for teachers to focus primarily on repertoire--pieces--and especially difficult pieces--at the expense of scale work and etudes? Maybe i should move it to the discussion board, but perhaps it has been asked before.
This entry has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.