Written by Brian Larson
Published: December 9, 2014 at 6:44 AM [UTC]
I am a professional musician and teacher in S.E. Asia. I have always had the utmost respect for SQ and their service... until the recent events with a Swiss Youth Orchestra, trying to board SQ in Hong Kong.
As you are aware - this story is making its rounds extremely rapidly through social media, FB, Slipped-Disc.com, etc and should be addressed as soon as possible, through proper PR channels. The music world - professional, and student - is an extremely connected forum: and musicians also have a following of millions of fans and audience.
I have travelled many times on SQ, MAS, CX, AirAsia with my violin (one of the main instruments mentioned as not allowed by your Hong Kong ground staff.) - and I've never had a problem. In the USA, for instance, it is written into aviation law as an allowable item.
Having your staff properly trained is your own responsibility: Not the job of musicians to educate them. Those of us who travel to play, professionally, pay A LOT of attention to news of this nature. We absolutely cannot afford to have glitches at an airport with a belligerent, under-trained staff. We would rather pay a few dollars more and feel assured that some nitwit won't demand that we risk $200K, $500K or more, to check a violin, when it is completely unnecessary. I fly on twin-prop commuter planes - and EVEN THERE the instrument fits easily in an overhead bin.
Please respond to the story. Please re-assure the travelling musician public that this is an anomaly and is being rectified. OTHERWISE: expect this story to be circulated for months!
This entry has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.
Violinist.com is made possible by...
Discover the best of Violinist.com in these collections of editor Laurie Niles' exclusive interviews.