E stringsAccessories: preference on E strings that would give warmer tone
From Wangchen Long
I have been using the Goldbrokat for years, but recently experimented with Evah Pirazzi's Gold E and Pirastro Gold Label E and like the later the best. It seems to give a warmer tone and fits my violin. Of course personally I love a warmer sound, as I like Pirastro Olive and Euroda strings...
Though the instrument and personal preferences play a big role, it would be interested to see what other prefers as the E string.
From Jim Hastings
Posted on July 9, 2011 at 06:11 PM
I don't have any experience with the Pirazzis yet, but the Gold Label E, which you mentioned, has pleased me well on my three older instruments. With each one, I definitely get the warmer sound I'm looking for.
Still, with so many individual tastes and preferences, who knows? Someone else might pick up my instruments and try them out and not like the results with my setup. Of course, as I'm sure you know, a player's touch makes a difference.
I tried Vision regular or solo -- I'm sure it was one of the two -- in 2005. It did well here. No experience yet with Olivs. I seem to recall trying the Goldbrokat in 2005, but I don't recall offhand what result I got from it.
I definitely tried the Jargar Forte E the same year, 2005, with Dominant A-D-G; but this E a bit too strong and penetrating for me with the Dominants and the instrument I used in on, so I gave it away to a v.com member who had already had good results with the Jargar.
Most of my string experience so far is with the Pirastro group. The Eudoxa wound E gives a nice sound on all my instruments, but I prefer the greater sheen and brilliance I can get in higher notes by substituting the Gold Label E. This E and Eudoxa A-D-G -- stiff D-G -- give me what I want on two instruments -- a viola sound in low notes and a warm brightness in high tones.
The third fiddle pleases me well with Wondertone Solo E-A-D and Eudoxa G, stiff version once again.
From Joyce Lin
Posted on July 9, 2011 at 06:21 PM
Here are some E strings mentioned repeatedly in this forum:
From elise stanley
Posted on July 9, 2011 at 07:55 PM
Sometimes I wonder if there is actually only one kind of (steel, unwound) E-string - and lots of different coloured packages and winding.
Its well established, just ask Buri, that the original E string steel wire was developed for cutting the very hard parmigiano cheese in northern Italy...
From Joyce Lin
Posted on July 9, 2011 at 11:07 PM
I believe that Evah Pirazzi Silvery Steel E is the same as the E in Passione and Wondertone Solo sets, but each E on the list above produces a distinct sound on my violin, so I'm pretty sure they are not the same.
From Jiefei Fang
Posted on July 10, 2011 at 07:34 AM
Keep in mind that not all steel is equal - some types of steel have more carbon, resulting in a stronger but stiffer alloy, and some have less - resulting in the opposite. Add to the mix that some steel e-strings have small amounts of chrome or tin in the alloy, which improves corrosion resistance. Examples would be the Jargar e-string (chrome) or the Tzigane e-string (Tin).
That is to say, even with just unwound steel E-strings, there is enough variety that saying they're the same is as much a fallacy as saying all plain gut strings are the same, or that all nylon-core strings are the same.
As for an e-string that sounds "warm," I prefer the Goldbrokat medium gauge over everything else I've tried, on both of my violins. This string list includes:
Pirastro 'Passione' silvery-steel E, heavy gauge
Jargar's Chrome-plated E, heavy gauge
Larsen's 'Tzigane' Tin-plated E, medium gauge
Lenzner Goldbrokat E, heavy gauge
Pirastro's "Universal No. 1" steel-wound-on-steel E, medium gauge
Pirastro 'Olive' gold-plated E, medium gauge
I find that while the medium Goldbrokat is quite edgy and bright at a close distance, it isn't by any means shrill and the projected tone sounds warmer than that of the other strings. For instance, the Jargar forte E sounds a bit warmer to me at a close distance, but on recordings it's the Goldbrokat that produces the most vibrant and warm tone. I've found the Universal No. 1 to be a moderately close second, though it lacks the power and edge of the Goldbrokat on my instruments.
From elise stanley
Posted on July 10, 2011 at 09:57 AM
[Jeifei - I was just having a tongue-in-cheek moment. And as far as I am aware, there is no evidence that E strings were originally for cutting cheese either;) ]
From Brian Lee
Posted on July 10, 2011 at 12:37 PM
I agree with Jiefei, the .26 gauge Goldbrokat is extremely warm sounding on many violins.
A violin that was loaned to me once came strung with Evah Pirazzis and a Pirastro Universal E; I swapped the E in favor of my usual medium gauge Gold Label, which didn't work at all, it sounded pretty much dead; I then exchanged it for a medium gauge Goldbrokat. Still dead. I switched back to the Universal E and it sounded awesome again (I guess that's why whoever set up the violin put it there); it was one of the warmest E strings on any instrument I had played.
From Royce Faina
Posted on July 11, 2011 at 01:17 PM
E strings were originally for cutting cheese
Maybe there is hope for Dominant E strings having a purpose? :^)
From Jiefei Fang
Posted on July 11, 2011 at 02:13 PM
"E strings were originally for cutting cheese
Maybe there is hope for Dominant E strings having a purpose? :^)"
I assumed so since they tend to stink.
From Mark Woodman"E strings were originally for cutting cheese"
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 10:57 PM
... and G strings were originally used for? :)
From Patrick TinneyActually a couple of decades ago a cellist retired to Austin and immediately went on a tour put on by my former parish (I want to say Germany).
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 11:15 PM
I had several friends who went on the trip and one of the things I heard from several of them was that the cellist carried a (wire) cheese cutter that he used to keep his fingers in shape. At least two of my friends demonstrated a motion I knew to be vibrato.
So cheese cutter indeed.
From Bryan DohertyOnce my mother needed some wire to make my sister's wedding veil. Neither of us could find some, so I gave her an old gold plated E-string. It worked very well and my sister still doesn't know.
Posted on December 23, 2011 at 11:22 PM
From Adrian HeathI've said it elswhere, but am I the only wierdo who actually prefers the dominant aluminium-wound E (or the Eudoxa equivalent)?
Posted on October 14, 2012 at 08:02 PM
True, I am really a violist who flirts (frequently) with the violin for its silky sweet highs. Plain steel E's remind me of the dentist's drill!
However, when I do need more projection, I change to a plain steel E, with a Chromecore Eudoxa A to match the E better.
From Simon StreuffThe Problem wich I encountered with the Eudoxa-E (middle), wich has a beautiful sound and handling, is the lack of power in the very high register. I will try the strong version of it soon.
Posted on October 14, 2012 at 09:38 PM
From Parker DucheminHas anyone here tried Westminster? Plain steel & not very expensive. I heard that Pinchas Zukerman uses them, so I'm trying them out now. I think they're an improvement on the Gold Label that I used before. They have power in the high end, and some warmth.
Posted on October 14, 2012 at 11:04 PM
From Darrett SmithPinchas Zukerman uses the Westminster heavy gauge E, as does Perlman, Rosenberg, Cho-Liang Lin, Kremer, etc..
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 03:59 AM
From Brian LeeThe Westminster heavy gauge E is my second favorite E string after the Jargar heavy E; I use it in humid seasons if I'm not able to go to my luthier to have my soundpost tightened, and on violins that don't speak easily on the lower strings - it seems to help free the sound a little bit
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 04:08 AM
From Adrian HeathSimon, I agree about the lack of power on the high notes. I wonder how Joachim managed the Brahms concerto on a gut E!
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 06:57 AM
From elise stanleyWith all the (almost) unanimous negative press the Dominant E has recieved, how come the manufacturer has not changed it? Don't they listen to user feedback?
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 07:20 AM
From Brian LeeFrom what my luthier tells me, Dominants were never designed to be really great strings - they were designed to be pitch stable, and one day, Pinchas Zukerman tried them and really liked them, and everybody else followed suit (or something along those lines).
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 07:49 AM
Maybe they're keeping the E string as it is as an extra incentive for people to switch to Vision Solo or PI strings...
From Simon StreuffAdrian, or imagine Milstein, who played the Eudoxa E as far as I know. But I must say his sound wasnt the loudest, but very delicate and I think he used a lot of bow speed instead of pressure.
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 08:30 AM
Can anyone tell me where I can find the Eudoxa-E heavy, because in germany and Austria they seem to have stopped the production.
From Adrian HeathElise, why on earth should Thomastik abandon this lovely string, whe most folks use the excellent Jargar (or Infeld etc.) anyway. I wonder if anyone has compared it to the (higher tension) Dominant plain steel E?
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 09:28 AM
Simon, you have hit the nail on the head! I have always advocated a progressively longer, lighter stroke as we pass from low to high strings.
As I am now waiting for the men in white coats anyway, I shall also admit to prefering the Dominant A on my viola! I like all my high notes to have a silk-like sheen, rather than a chromium-plated glare. If it's beautiful, there is no need to scream, and if it's not beautiful, there's no need to scream either..
From Brian LeeMilstein used a Goldbrokat .26 gauge E
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM
From Simon Streuffah ok, I didn't remember that. I don't like the Goldbrokat strings, but maybe if you have a strad they are ok.
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 03:06 PM
Adrian: Yes, much bowspeed is good, but what do you do when facing legato fortissimo up there!? I had the problem once and since then Eudoxa middle is not useful for me anymore, maybe for bach solo, where it stays first position most of the time.
From elise stanleyTell you what, Adrian, why don't you just invite all the V.com Dominant pack-purchasers to send you their spare 'E's? You might get enough to sew a suit of chain-mail armour...
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 03:19 PM
From Adrian HeathSimon, in such cases written slurs are there to be divided, (but not on the main beats): I treat them as phrasing, rather than bowing, marks.
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 04:01 PM
Elise, when I do put on a harder E, my more sensitive pupils wince! And it's not just my heavy-handed viola bowing arm..
From Trevor JenningsAdrian, I have use gut Es a lot over the last couple of years and I can assure you the sound they produce in altissimo, in terms of projection, quality and clarity, surpasses that of all the metal Es I've used. The secret of this of course lies in the bowing - the one thing you never do is to treat a gut E like a steel E.
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 04:02 PM
In the first position, the quality of the F and F# is far better than that of most metal Es. Tuning stability is good too, once they've settled in, which doesn't take more than a few hours. Another advantage of the gut E is the smooth tonal progression between a gut A and the gut E.
The main disadvantage of the gut E is that it doesn't last long - perhaps two to four weeks for most, six weeks if you're lucky. This may be significant for those who are not baroque specialists.
Btw, I've never had a gut E break on me - after a while it starts to fray and when the fraying becomes unacceptable under the fingers and tonally then the string ends its days tying plants in the garden. I'll have to try a laquered E sometime to see if they last longer.
From Simon StreuffYes Adrian, thats a possibility, but when you play in a ensemble or string section wich requires the same bowing it gets impossible. Also I like slow heavy bows from time to time.
Posted on October 15, 2012 at 10:25 PM
From Tristan BayerI just put a full set of obligato's on my violin and they sound lovely. I really like the E as well. It has a nice warmth to it. But it is only my second set of strings so I'm not the best person to talk to. (The first ones were dominants... ugh...).
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 01:41 AM
From Brian LeeThe Obligato E is the same as the Gold Label E
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 02:14 AM
From Andrew HollandI think the Gold Label E and Obligato E are different. Maybe the gauges are slightly different - I don't know - but I felt they sounded very different when trying them on the same violin, one afer another (I tried medium gauge of both).
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 04:24 PM
From Brian LeeBack when I used to use the Gold Label E a few years ago, I'd use those two E strings interchangeably - the violin shop I went to said that they were identical except for the silk wrapping, and that the Obligato E was slightly cheaper. They said that the Violino, Aricore, and Synoxa E strings are also all the same string.
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 08:52 PM
From Paul ChanWonder if Pirastro has just 1 of each of steel, chrome, aluminum, and gold E. Then put different silking on them for different sets.
Posted on October 16, 2012 at 10:24 PM
Violinist Frank Almond tells the life story of the 1715 Lipinski Strad in his new recording, "A Violin's Life."
Please consider supporting Violinist.com by becoming a sponsor, and reaching our dedicated community of violin professionals, students and fans!