How much to solo violinists on tour earn?Violinists: Recordings and Performances: How much does an internationally famous solo violinist who is constantly on tour make each year? As in Joshua Bell, Sarah Chang, or Hilary Hahn?
From Sarah C
From Christina C.Can’t really answer that on a per year basis because it depends on how many concerts the soloist decides to perform in a year. I did hear what one of those violinists charged as a fee for a single recital here a few years ago, but I may be remembering the actual amount completely wrong. I know the organizers of this particular series & am seeing them tonight so maybe I can find out. As for how many concert per year, I know of another relatively top-name soloist (a pianist ) who said that so far he’s scheduled to perform over 50 different concertos this season.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 03:13 PM
From Nate RobinsonA top tier soloist can make up to 50,000 a concert. I read Pavarotti was paid 130,000 dollars in the 80's to sing the national anthem at a soccer game.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 03:20 PM
From Bill WaldermanNone of our business.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 03:43 PM
From Dave OsbunI performed as a soloist at an art show about 6 months ago and earned $1.45 in tips for playing three hours.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 03:47 PM
I'm not kidding.
From Christian VachonHi,
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 04:02 PM
It is important to add to that from the fee (which may seem high), the artists have to pay for airfare or other means of travel/transportation, meals, accomadations, a percentage of the fee to their agency, as well as other expenses (plus income tax, etc.). So, that I guess means that it varies from person to person.
From Bill WaldermanJoshua Bell made a buck or so from his performance in the Washington, DC metro.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 04:07 PM
From Joe ChristiansonMy conductor at Interlochen said that Joshua Bell gets paid around 75k per concert!
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 05:21 PM
From Terez Mertes>It is important to add to that from the fee (which may seem high), the artists have to pay for airfare or other means of travel/transportation, meals, accomadations, a percentage of the fee to their agency, as well as other expenses (plus income tax, etc.).
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 05:29 PM
Wow, this is interesting. I would have thought the artist's management company would take care of that. Or wait, do they receive the payment, take care of accommodation arrangements, take their cut and then forward the rest to the artist? And when the artist is on the road, does he/she stay in the hotel of their choice or where their mgmt company decides to put them, ie in a hotel where they might have a relationship with one of the hotel sales managers? (This is commonly the case with rock bands and pop singers, I know from past experience in hotel sales.) Christian, do you know the answer here?
What I would like to know more about would be the touring life, payment and schedule of a successful international soloist who isn't a Josh/Hilary/Sarah/Midori, but is still high up there on the ladder. Anne H., you out there? You gave me some good estimates when I brought up this issue in my fiction writing.
From Tom HolzmanActually, Bill, Bell made something between $30 and $40 from his stint at the metro.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 05:57 PM
From Kevin CheungThe countertenor Daniel Taylor said roughly 20% of the paycheck goes into his own pocket. Everything else goes to the agent, travel, accommodation, meals, local taxes.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 06:19 PM
From Megan ChapelasTerez, I think artists' agents are just like model agents - you don't get the work without them, but OHHH there's a price to pay...
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 06:41 PM
From Pieter ViljoenI think that very busy soloists do pretty well. I've heard that the really bankable big names get a lot of the extra costs paid for, like flight, hotel, and a per diem. This could be total bull however. I did have a "source" who would tell me how much the soloists were making in Montreal. Some of them are taking quite a decent pay cheque, but I don't know how much they keep with VAT, income tax, and the very high cost of living on the road.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 06:55 PM
A while ago someone posted a sort of typical scheme for a $10,000 pay check. It didn't leave that much.
I think that relative to study, time spent practicing, travel and solitude, most soloists aren't that well paid. I think most will tell you they do quite well for themselves, but the work is tough.
The ones living for the high life definately do work for it. I'm exhausted after a week of 3 or 4 flights... imagine a whole year like that. With 100 concerts a year, that's exactly what you're looking at.
From al kudoes 2 mil or 4 mil make any difference?:)
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 06:57 PM
they are doing what they love,,,too busy to count the notes...
From Pieter ViljoenAl... with those kinds of figures you're refering to very few violinists... I don't think that reflects the situation of most soloists.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 07:03 PM
From Ray RandallI read an article somewhere last year that said most soloists, even major prize winners, barely make expenses nowadays. They go on a "B" circuit getting rave reviews and little money.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 07:12 PM
In the 1970's when I was running the Stamford Symphonty several local name artists, Victor Borge, Hermione Gingold, and a name violinist frequently mentioned here, waived their $5,000 to $7,000 fees. The bigger the name the more they were willing to help us out, but it was the middle of the road soloists who wanted to know "what's in it for me." I'm finding that to be true again with the Town and Country Symphony.
From Anne HorvathThe biggest fee I have heard of (second hand), a marquee name, was $150,000 for one concert with a flyover ICSOM orchestra.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 07:40 PM
I have mixed feelings about these high fees. Some of the soloists I really admire make a lot of money per concert. That is fine, nice work if you can get it. (I wish I could!) The toughest thing in the world is to sustain a solo career. Make hay whilst the sun shines, etc. When these soloists play with Non Big 10 flyover ICSOM and ROPA orchestras that are facing declining audiences, and substantial pay cuts, you have to wonder. Would there be an audience at all without "The Marquee Name" to attract attendance? Are these soloist fees worth the money to keep the orchestra going? I have no answer. The orchestra that hosted that soloist had a base pay of around 25K.
The REAL $$$ is in conducting...
From Pieter ViljoenAnne... the duties of a conductor are nothing like a soloist. There's no fund raising, glad handing, personel etc...
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 09:29 PM
From Dana BeattieMy local symphony paid 65K to Perlman. Bell was less, I think, but we lost money on him....
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 09:30 PM
From al kupieter, i was just thinking ahead for you:)
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 09:31 PM
From Pieter Viljoenal... dont you get it? There isn't really that much money in conducting relative to other professions and relative to your responsibilities.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 09:50 PM
From Ihnsouk GuimIs the polarization in the pay scale, say between section players, soloists and/or conductors necessary? Or was it born out of star worship that everyone has to have a limited few players on board? What would be better for a long term health of music; More players sharing solo performances at a relaxed pace at a lower fee or exposing the audience to 3 or 4 soloists over and over again?
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 09:33 PM
From Jim FellowsAs far as expenses, each artist/manager is different as far as some of the amenities requested, but generally the orchestra picks up the tab for air, ground transportation while there, and hotel. A number of years ago here, Pavarotti not only asked to be paid in cash, but also wanted a horse.
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 09:50 PM
From Stephen Brivatito eat?
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 10:40 PM
From Ihnsouk GuimPieter - Do guest conductors attend fund raising, personnel, etc?
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 11:39 PM
If a soloist is paid 65K per visit of 4-5 days, in two visits the soloist makes as much as what a decent section member makes in a year.
From Linda LAha, Buri... you never cease to amaze me!
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 11:46 PM
From Pieter ViljoenIhnsouk,
Posted on October 11, 2007 at 11:51 PM
No, that's definately a "perk", and conductors only have to spend a certain amount of weeks with their home orchestra. However, it's still important to recognize that they have a lot of expectations.
From Kenneth KensekFew solo violinist can make a living on just concertizing. I doubt there are more then a dozen who do.
Posted on October 12, 2007 at 12:41 AM
From Pieter ViljoenKenneth, I might push that number to about 20... but you are quite right.
Posted on October 12, 2007 at 01:21 AM
From Terez MertesNo WAY. Only 1 to 2 dozen concertizing soloists making a good living off it? Whoa. This is a very enlightening thread. Keep it going!
Posted on October 12, 2007 at 01:22 AM
From Ihnsouk GuimHow much does a guest conductor get paid? If quite a bit more than a soloist who gets paid 65K, we are talking about 6 figures for a week. What expecxtations do they meet for that kind of pay? I have nothing against people getting paid well if a good pay is widespread in the musical world as in the financial district or in a medical profession. What concerns me is the extreme disparity and the rising ticket price. Is it good for the classical music or its dwindling audience?
Posted on October 12, 2007 at 01:46 AM
From Pieter ViljoenTerez, we're all just speculating, but a quick run down of touring artists that I know of and it does come out to around 20. That is, 20 players who devote most of their time to solo, recital and maybe some chamber music performances. There are probably a few hundred people who make a portion of their living performing at a very high level as a soloist, but supplement their incomes with a teaching position or playing in a small ensemble.
Posted on October 12, 2007 at 02:06 AM
From Bill BusenPavarotti not only asked to be paid in cash, but also wanted a horse.
Posted on October 12, 2007 at 03:43 AM
Nya-nya-nyahh! Pavarotti liked our horse better. :-P
From Noel PinningtonNothing better for the inside of a person than the outside of a horse.
Posted on October 12, 2007 at 07:50 AM
Hear more from the world's top violinists in The Violinist.com Interviews: Volume 1, which includes our exclusive conversations with Joshua Bell, Sarah Chang, and David Garrett, and others, as well as a foreword by Hilary Hahn.
Smiling as he spoke, Steinhardt offered his suggestions with clarity and appeal, in language both efficient and richly meaningful.
Please consider supporting Violinist.com by becoming a sponsor, and reaching our dedicated community of violin professionals, students and fans!