October 16, 2010 at 6:12 AM
I'm talking about building good technique.
Some people swear by scales, and I know at least one who believes etudes are the answer. "Review" is a Suzuki mantra for keeping old pieces alive and well, and that also builds technique. Then there's the challenge of something new.
A diet of all these things might be the best way. Which do you think is the most effective ingredient for building a sound technique?
I voted ALL OF THE ABOVE. Random thoughts right off:
Scales help me keep in shape. Ditto for shifting, double-stops, and Sevcik-type finger exercises.
Etudes help me to keep focused on expressiveness and musicality.
New pieces help me stretch my mental muscles and keep me from getting into a comfortable rut.
Review helps me see where the technique has matured and where old problems have disappeared or are in process of disappearing.
My practice sessions are about 2 parts of technique to 1 part of repertoire. I know that may sound a little out of balance to some, but I get a lot of fun out of technical stuff. One thing I like to do is intersperse periods of technical drill with pure pleasure-playing; this helps my endurance.
I voted “all of the above”, and I missed Šev?ík. Fun vote, again!
Petition to management: please make it possible to spell Šev?ík correctly on Violinist.com .
Jim, thanks for sharing your method. They inspire this new amateur violinist.
For some reason I only saw the poll, I couldn't see a way to vote. Does that mean my vote went on automatically?
Not that it really matters since I agree with the outcome, its just a bit odd...
All of the above are valuable for technique it's true, but in terms of the BEST way, I voted for scales. I believe that scales are the primary building block of left hand technique.
something got reset because I just got to vote. I went for all of the above (assuming of course that it meant all of the below, cause there wasn't anything above cept a title!).
This subject has been more on my mind than other weekend votes. Is it common these days for teachers to focus primarily on repertoire--pieces--and especially difficult pieces--at the expense of scale work and etudes? Maybe i should move it to the discussion board, but perhaps it has been asked before.
This entry has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.