Comments

From Hannah Wright
Posted from 75.170.192.234 on June 14, 2008 at 4:55 AM (GMT)
no, i'm not in denial...but because i don't i don't!

So both answers? :P

From Laurie Niles
Posted from 75.4.242.110 on June 14, 2008 at 5:07 AM (GMT)
Ex-CACTLY! ;)
From Ted Naemura
Posted from 71.193.203.13 on June 14, 2008 at 7:45 AM (GMT)
Perhaps there’s a notion we could call VUII: Violining Under the Influence of Intoxicants. Consider how the law provides that it is okay to drive after you’ve been drinking, you just can’t drive while under the influence of what you’ve consumed. Like driving, stringed instruments are complex pursuits. Stringed instruments recruit so many fine motor skills. Practicing strings requires a cheerful and open attitude, and dividing attention simultaneously between many small tasks. None of those components really succeed while playing/practicing “impaired.” If you’ve ever practiced after taking a glass of wine, for example, you have probably experienced some of this inhibiting effect.

If one is going to take up his or her violin, and has or will consume drugs or alcohol in conjunction with playing, the union of chemical and string is something to think about. Speaking only for myself, I believe the less necessary it is that a person ingests a substance during an endeavor as physically fickle as violin tone production, the more one might examine why one is employing the chemical in the first place.

If you do put the question to yourself and it’s just too hard to answer, or if you have some rather unique answers to the question, or if the mere inquiry makes you feel defensive . . . those do start sounding like denial/rationalization/avoidance components of a larger problem.

Music and addiction are strongly attached to emotional states. I wonder if anyone in science or academia has rigorously studied the interrelationships as pertains to chemically-dependent classical musicians; finding the themes to their adventures.

From Jim W. Miller
Posted from 172.162.120.106 on June 14, 2008 at 7:59 AM (GMT)
"What is considered a substance?"

If some half-wits can make a buck if something's a substance, then it's a substance.

From Charles C
Posted from 66.249.85.69 on June 14, 2008 at 8:51 AM (GMT)
Isn't playing the violin enough of a drug in itself that we don't need crack (unlike those violists needing a break from their misery)?
From Anne Horvath
Posted from 71.12.189.144 on June 14, 2008 at 12:55 PM (GMT)
I have nothing of substance to say, but I do have a chocolate abuse problem...

Seriously, beta blockers can hardly be put into a substance abuse category.

From Yixi Zhang
Posted from 24.68.178.180 on June 14, 2008 at 4:57 PM (GMT)
LOL Charles! I’m on cracklin and I’m not sure whether v.com is my cracklin support group or a substance itself (crackvicom?):-)
From Laurie Niles
Posted from 75.4.242.110 on June 14, 2008 at 5:32 PM (GMT)
Oh geez Anne, how could I forget chocolate? But seriously, you are right, it does not seem right to lump beta-blockers in with "substance abuse" stories. They seem like two separate issues.
From Jim W. Miller
Posted from 172.162.120.106 on June 14, 2008 at 5:44 PM (GMT)
In my hood we have roving gangs of nervous classical musicians breaking into houses to buy beta-blockers. I'd call it a problem.
From Bernadette Hawes
Posted from 83.7.230.158 on June 14, 2008 at 7:34 PM (GMT)
If drinking 10 cups of very strong tea a day is substance abuse, then I'm guilty!
Otherwise I'm in denial ha ha.
From Joe S.
Posted from 65.120.5.160 on June 14, 2008 at 11:46 PM (GMT)
Bring on the Tequila!!!!
From Bob Annis
Posted from 63.80.166.126 on June 15, 2008 at 3:45 PM (GMT)
I find I can no longer abuse caffeine. Now THAT's a problem.

Due to time and income constraints, my problem seems to be a massive drug deficiency. I hope to work on it in future.

From Charles C
Posted from 66.249.85.69 on June 15, 2008 at 6:37 PM (GMT)
Yes. From now on aspiring crackalinists must consume massive amounts of Kracktzer and Fleth and Sevcoke and Pagajuana and Auerin and Galamabis.
From Mellisa Nill
Posted from 209.193.21.233 on June 16, 2008 at 12:05 AM (GMT)
I was recently directing a beginner ensemble while taking a narcotic for a chronic back problem that I have. While attempting to make a decision on the bowing of a passage I made the comment "Never make bowing decisions under the influence of narcotics", because I couldn't make up my mind.

One of my players made it her MySpace quote, and in less than 12 hours, v-commer and friend Emily found it and asked me about it.

Lesson learned: keep your mouth shut when trying to make bowing decisions under the influence of narcotics, especially when you live in a small town.

From Emily Grossman
Posted from 66.230.105.190 on June 16, 2008 at 12:35 AM (GMT)
Never admit to a substance abuse problem in a small town...

:)

From Laurie Niles
Posted from 75.4.242.110 on June 16, 2008 at 5:20 AM (GMT)
Actually Robert and I considered installing a Breathalyzer test for posting on V.com, along with a public-service "Don't drink and post!" campaign.
From Stephen Brivati
Posted from 211.1.219.201 on June 16, 2008 at 10:57 PM (GMT)
Greetings,
since Laurie seems determined to include prunes among contraversial `substances` I tried some abuse. I sat a prune on a cold hard plate and shouted at it for three hours using the vilest language possible. Then I ate it.
Alas, it had the last word....
Cheers,
Buri
From Bob Annis
Posted from 96.241.92.246 on June 17, 2008 at 3:45 AM (GMT)
Here in the US we waterboard our prunes. Better hurry before the new congress outlaws that sort of thing.
From Eitan Silkoff
Posted from 71.58.80.187 on June 17, 2008 at 4:58 AM (GMT)
yea steven why is it you have so many typing errors?
From Stephen Brivati
Posted from 210.172.199.2 on June 17, 2008 at 11:21 PM (GMT)
you mean like writing myname wrong?;)