From Shailee Kennedy Posted from 204.212.175.36 on November 29, 2007 at 3:47 PM (GMT)
I'm curious---why do you say don't listen to a recording before trying to play the piece?
From Charlie Caldwell Posted from 128.192.193.172 on November 29, 2007 at 5:50 PM (GMT)
I'm curious. What exactly is the point of listening to a piece of music before you play it? It gets in the way of my own learning process when I listen to someone else play a piece I have just started working on.
From Shailee Kennedy Posted from 204.212.175.36 on November 29, 2007 at 6:21 PM (GMT)
Well, for one, I imagine it would help with memorization---you would know how it's supposed to sound, therefore it would be easier to put together.
I'm just asking because I don't play classical music and it's a real puzzle to me the way classical players don't listen to music before starting to learn it. For me, it's the other way around---the more I've listened to a tune, the more versions of it I've heard, the more I internalize the melody and the easier it is to play. It doesn't mean I mimic what I hear exactly, but I appreciate the creativity of other musicians and learn from their ideas.
I am interested in the classical viewpoint, though, especially why it's so strict---many people seem to feel that listening first is a very bad idea, and I would like to know why.
From Drew Lecher Posted from 64.53.208.254 on November 29, 2007 at 6:40 PM (GMT)
“If you have heard a recording that supplied the initial inspiration and kindled the desire to learn the given piece — that is enough.” D.L.
Your questions, Shailee, and Charlie’s points, are both understandable and valid.
It does help to listen to other musicians’ interpretations, but can also make the classical musician in particular lose a bit of their own creativity of interpretation. Unlike jazz and other styles where the musician is actually recreating the music by modifying the “licks” and rearranging patterns, etc., the “classical” musician is restricted to the notes, rhythms and dynamics given by the composer. The exception to this is in baroque and some other periods within which we will add embellishments — trills, scales, arpeggios, etc. Also, cadenzas are our time to let loose with great freedom of compositional style — hopefully staying faithful and appropriate to the given composition.
I prefer to work on the composition independent of others interpretations. For me, it actually awakens my thought process regarding all the variables of fingerings, string selection, bowing styles and a host of other choices.
Afterwards, I will listen to various artists and analyze their interpretations compared to mine. This enables me to re-evaluate both and modify further should I feel a need to do so.
Hope this helps. Drew
From Karen Allendoerfer Posted from 18.4.1.76 on November 29, 2007 at 8:33 PM (GMT)
I rarely listened to recordings of pieces I was working on when I was a student, but I do so much more now that recordings are more accessible. Just relying on my own ear, without any external frame of reference, has sometimes resulted in my "learning" it out of tune or just plain wrong and not knowing that there was anything wrong with it until someone else pointed it out, maybe at the next week's lesson, or even later. I've even learned and internalized totally wrong notes because I misread the music--especially when I was first learning to read alto clef for the viola--and only realized later, after listening to a recording, that I was playing a wrong note and corrected it.
What about having your teacher play it through for you--is that like listening to a recording too?
From Ray Randall Posted from 24.107.99.126 on November 29, 2007 at 9:14 PM (GMT)
Hi, Drew, good advice, but exactly what do you mean by hand groups? Thanks.
From Pauline Lerner Posted from 70.108.139.225 on November 30, 2007 at 2:19 AM (GMT)
I advocate listening to a recording or your teacher playing a piece before you give it your first try. My students all say that that helps, and I know it helps me when I am the student. The first time you play a piece, you focus on playing the notes correctly, but you don't "hear" the piece in a "gestalt" sense. That's why it helps to listen to the piece before you start to play it. I find that this is true whether I'm learning a piece from a written page or by ear. I do not advocate mimicking someone else's style.
From Mendy Smith Posted from 207.69.139.144 on November 30, 2007 at 5:45 AM (GMT)
When I learn a new piece I either listen to a recording while reading through the music (minus instrument), or do a "play-along" with my teacher. For me this helps with tempo, rhythm, and "laying the ground-work" in my head. This is especially helpful if I have never heard the piece before. I don't use this as a basis of developing my own interpretation, but just as a starting point. Is this detrimental in a way that I'm not realizing?
From Drew Lecher Posted from 64.53.208.254 on November 30, 2007 at 7:23 AM (GMT)
Karen, Having the teacher play through or an initial listening to a recording are both good. Also, sight-reading some of it in the lesson enabling the teacher to guide one through the more difficult sections is very good.
Note the key, tune your fingers using the open strings (even if they clash harmonically with the piece) and double-stops when traversing from one string to the next.
Part of the point is to improve reading skills and be more independent in the learning process. This helps on all levels.
Ray, Hand Groups are the interval combinations or patterns of measurement for the fingers. They are the “words” – the language of notes and intervals as translated from the page to the violin fingerboard.
Such as a combination of interval spacing between fingers, as in, open/closed/open or whole/half/whole, steps or tones which is the “Beginning Hand Group” – BH. Pitch intervals change with varied string combinations, but the Hand Group can remain the same. (Excerpt from my violin and viola books.)
I teach 20 different Hand Groups in the books and they are great intonation studies in and of themselves.
Pauline, I agree wholeheartedly. We all must have an idea of the sound and a student needs that initial listening for inspiration and guidance.
After that is when they will gain tremendous independence technically and artistically working on the piece along with guidance from their teacher and or a periodic repeat listening to a recording, even preferably by another artist as this will shed a great deal of light on how one artist interprets the given work and another artists has a different interpretation. (Libraries and friends are a great source of other recordings.)
Along with the gained independence comes an awareness of the tension and release the various notes contribute to the line, shape (gestalt), mood and character of the work. Perhaps the F# gives the feeling of needing increased drama and intensity or that of great exuberance and joy.
Mendy, No, it is not detrimental in any way:-) The “play-along” with the teacher is my least favorite choice unless the teacher is playing some of the accompaniment, but it wont hurt you. We all learn in many varied ways. Some ways promote greater independence in the student and others are more gently nurturing. It depends on the level and personal character of the individual.
Reading through the music without the instrument is wonderful, whether with a recording or later on in silence while hearing the music, with its ebbs and flows, all in the mind. During this we can imagine the type of sound, the required draw of the bow, the timing of the shift, the quality of vibrato and so much more!
Thank you all for your comments and questions. I hope this helps. Drew
Comments
Posted from 204.212.175.36 on November 29, 2007 at 3:47 PM (GMT)
Posted from 128.192.193.172 on November 29, 2007 at 5:50 PM (GMT)
Posted from 204.212.175.36 on November 29, 2007 at 6:21 PM (GMT)
I'm just asking because I don't play classical music and it's a real puzzle to me the way classical players don't listen to music before starting to learn it. For me, it's the other way around---the more I've listened to a tune, the more versions of it I've heard, the more I internalize the melody and the easier it is to play. It doesn't mean I mimic what I hear exactly, but I appreciate the creativity of other musicians and learn from their ideas.
I am interested in the classical viewpoint, though, especially why it's so strict---many people seem to feel that listening first is a very bad idea, and I would like to know why.
Posted from 64.53.208.254 on November 29, 2007 at 6:40 PM (GMT)
Your questions, Shailee, and Charlie’s points, are both understandable and valid.
It does help to listen to other musicians’ interpretations, but can also make the classical musician in particular lose a bit of their own creativity of interpretation. Unlike jazz and other styles where the musician is actually recreating the music by modifying the “licks” and rearranging patterns, etc., the “classical” musician is restricted to the notes, rhythms and dynamics given by the composer. The exception to this is in baroque and some other periods within which we will add embellishments — trills, scales, arpeggios, etc. Also, cadenzas are our time to let loose with great freedom of compositional style — hopefully staying faithful and appropriate to the given composition.
I prefer to work on the composition independent of others interpretations. For me, it actually awakens my thought process regarding all the variables of fingerings, string selection, bowing styles and a host of other choices.
Afterwards, I will listen to various artists and analyze their interpretations compared to mine. This enables me to re-evaluate both and modify further should I feel a need to do so.
Hope this helps.
Drew
Posted from 18.4.1.76 on November 29, 2007 at 8:33 PM (GMT)
What about having your teacher play it through for you--is that like listening to a recording too?
Posted from 24.107.99.126 on November 29, 2007 at 9:14 PM (GMT)
Thanks.
Posted from 70.108.139.225 on November 30, 2007 at 2:19 AM (GMT)
Posted from 207.69.139.144 on November 30, 2007 at 5:45 AM (GMT)
Posted from 64.53.208.254 on November 30, 2007 at 7:23 AM (GMT)
Having the teacher play through or an initial listening to a recording are both good. Also, sight-reading some of it in the lesson enabling the teacher to guide one through the more difficult sections is very good.
Note the key, tune your fingers using the open strings (even if they clash harmonically with the piece) and double-stops when traversing from one string to the next.
Part of the point is to improve reading skills and be more independent in the learning process. This helps on all levels.
Ray,
Hand Groups are the interval combinations or patterns of measurement for the fingers. They are the “words” – the language of notes and intervals as translated from the page to the violin fingerboard.
Such as a combination of interval spacing between fingers, as in, open/closed/open or whole/half/whole, steps or tones which is the “Beginning Hand Group” – BH. Pitch intervals change with varied string combinations, but the Hand Group can remain the same. (Excerpt from my violin and viola books.)
I teach 20 different Hand Groups in the books and they are great intonation studies in and of themselves.
Pauline,
I agree wholeheartedly. We all must have an idea of the sound and a student needs that initial listening for inspiration and guidance.
After that is when they will gain tremendous independence technically and artistically working on the piece along with guidance from their teacher and or a periodic repeat listening to a recording, even preferably by another artist as this will shed a great deal of light on how one artist interprets the given work and another artists has a different interpretation. (Libraries and friends are a great source of other recordings.)
Along with the gained independence comes an awareness of the tension and release the various notes contribute to the line, shape (gestalt), mood and character of the work. Perhaps the F# gives the feeling of needing increased drama and intensity or that of great exuberance and joy.
Mendy,
No, it is not detrimental in any way:-) The “play-along” with the teacher is my least favorite choice unless the teacher is playing some of the accompaniment, but it wont hurt you. We all learn in many varied ways. Some ways promote greater independence in the student and others are more gently nurturing. It depends on the level and personal character of the individual.
Reading through the music without the instrument is wonderful, whether with a recording or later on in silence while hearing the music, with its ebbs and flows, all in the mind. During this we can imagine the type of sound, the required draw of the bow, the timing of the shift, the quality of vibrato and so much more!
Thank you all for your comments and questions.
I hope this helps.
Drew