From Jim W. Miller Posted from 172.169.10.243 on November 5, 2007 at 9:35 AM (GMT)
There are two approaches to this kind of thing. You can investigate it scientifically or you can write a Warren Zevon song about it.
From E. Smith Posted from 70.20.236.91 on November 5, 2007 at 4:26 PM (GMT)
I was thinking it looked more like an emergent snowman than a headless one.
From Emily Grossman Posted from 209.193.21.20 on November 5, 2007 at 6:04 PM (GMT)
Actually, that thought occurred to me too, like Michaelangelo's unfinished sculptures carving themselves out of the stone.
From Ihnsouk Guim Posted from 68.45.94.4 on November 5, 2007 at 7:30 PM (GMT)
Or a snow ducky?
From Linda L Posted from 24.189.235.83 on November 5, 2007 at 8:33 PM (GMT)
My moose! Don't hurt my moose!!! I promise it wasn't him.
From David Russell Posted from 64.12.116.75 on November 5, 2007 at 11:28 PM (GMT)
Wow, beautiful picture. I suspect some young lovers ascended the mountain in a previous snow (before the fresh one covered their tracks). They decided to leave a monument to their love on the summit-thus the snowman. As for the missing head-I propose either they got cold, saw a bear and ran, didn't see a bear and were EATEN(!), or decided they would roll the head home as a souvenir. What do you think? ;-)
From David Russell Posted from 64.12.116.75 on November 5, 2007 at 11:36 PM (GMT)
and by the way... you sound like you have GREAT tracking skills!
From Laurie Niles Posted from 75.5.11.22 on November 6, 2007 at 12:12 AM (GMT)
He looks like he's swimming in snow!
From Penny B Posted from 71.208.98.156 on November 6, 2007 at 3:56 AM (GMT)
Maybe he has a head, is so huge that his legs are hidden in the snow?
I'm jealous of your snow: ours keeps melting. I went fly fishing yesterday and the stream is actually blown out worse than during ice-out in late may =(
no trout for joo
From Pauline Lerner Posted from 70.108.139.225 on November 6, 2007 at 6:07 AM (GMT)
Emily, your photos are beautiful, and so is your writing. Does singing Broadway tunes really scare away bears?
From Bernadette Hawes Posted from 83.7.249.21 on November 6, 2007 at 8:53 AM (GMT)
Emily You're wonderfully brave for taking off on your own like that, or maybe where you live it's safer? I really admire your sense of direction seeing as I'm somewhat challenged in that department. I love your writings. If you ever write a book, let me know. Maybe the snowman was an unfinished work of art? Artist got cold and hungry? Lavine miraculously produced a big snowball? Anyway, put us out of our misery. You're so good at deducing who's been where, can you tell us your theory please?
From Terez Mertes Posted from 75.18.181.242 on November 7, 2007 at 6:55 PM (GMT)
Gee, it's that time of the year again already? Oh, California is way too warm for me.
Pretty pics.
From Mara Gerety Posted from 132.162.251.5 on November 8, 2007 at 6:09 AM (GMT)
It's not headless, it's buttless! It used to be an ordinary three-part snowman but then it kept snowing and snowing and eventually the bottom part disappeared, leaving only the top two showing above the snowdrifts.
From Emily Grossman Posted from 209.193.21.20 on November 8, 2007 at 6:40 AM (GMT)
Ah, but I know how deep the snow was there. I checked to be sure, and then I tried to make him a head, but the fresh snow was too dry.
From Emily Grossman Posted from 209.193.21.20 on November 8, 2007 at 6:45 AM (GMT)
...Although, who's to say snowmen couldn't come into the world head first? It's quite possible the bottom hadn't been born yet (although this would be a difficult way to make a snowman, from top to bottom). A faceless, bottomless snowman!
From Bernadette Hawes Posted from 83.7.247.212 on November 8, 2007 at 11:42 AM (GMT)
It's definitely a butt. No nose, mouth. He was a breech birth!
Comments
Posted from 172.169.10.243 on November 5, 2007 at 9:35 AM (GMT)
Posted from 70.20.236.91 on November 5, 2007 at 4:26 PM (GMT)
Posted from 209.193.21.20 on November 5, 2007 at 6:04 PM (GMT)
Posted from 68.45.94.4 on November 5, 2007 at 7:30 PM (GMT)
Posted from 24.189.235.83 on November 5, 2007 at 8:33 PM (GMT)
Posted from 64.12.116.75 on November 5, 2007 at 11:28 PM (GMT)
As for the missing head-I propose either they got cold, saw a bear and ran, didn't see a bear and were EATEN(!), or decided they would roll the head home as a souvenir. What do you think? ;-)
Posted from 64.12.116.75 on November 5, 2007 at 11:36 PM (GMT)
Posted from 75.5.11.22 on November 6, 2007 at 12:12 AM (GMT)
Posted from 71.208.98.156 on November 6, 2007 at 3:56 AM (GMT)
I'm jealous of your snow: ours keeps melting. I went fly fishing yesterday and the stream is actually blown out worse than during ice-out in late may =(
no trout for joo
Posted from 70.108.139.225 on November 6, 2007 at 6:07 AM (GMT)
Posted from 83.7.249.21 on November 6, 2007 at 8:53 AM (GMT)
You're wonderfully brave for taking off on your own like that, or maybe where you live it's safer? I really admire your sense of direction seeing as I'm somewhat challenged in that department.
I love your writings. If you ever write a book, let me know.
Maybe the snowman was an unfinished work of art? Artist got cold and hungry? Lavine miraculously produced a big snowball?
Anyway, put us out of our misery. You're so good at deducing who's been where, can you tell us your theory please?
Posted from 75.18.181.242 on November 7, 2007 at 6:55 PM (GMT)
Pretty pics.
Posted from 132.162.251.5 on November 8, 2007 at 6:09 AM (GMT)
Posted from 209.193.21.20 on November 8, 2007 at 6:40 AM (GMT)
Posted from 209.193.21.20 on November 8, 2007 at 6:45 AM (GMT)
Posted from 83.7.247.212 on November 8, 2007 at 11:42 AM (GMT)