Comments

Wow. I agree with you! There's obviously a case for keeping the Strad, but if selling it means that talented kids who would not otherwise have had the opportunity get to go to college, then how could they not? It just depends on what kind of program UCLA wants to be. Sure, you can dump the Strad, have more scholarships for students for a few years, buy some far lesser instruments. But the school would be losing an irreplacable asset, one that gives its music department something unique and of very high quality. Having a commitment to a Strad, or a library of manuscripts, or other things that are important to the preservation of music as a higher art, does make a difference. There is a reason why a music degree from Indiana University is different (and frankly more valued) from a music degree from the University of Nebraska at Omaha, and it has a lot to do with the university's commitment to music and ability to leverage fine teachers, research materials, etc. So giving away a Strad is a step backwards for a music program. IMO! I thin kit depends on what type of Strad it is. I've played and heard couple Strads that I wouldn't pay much more than $100,000 for in terms of sound. If it's one of those...dump it and give out some scholarships.

If it's in perfect condition and sounds like it too...dump it. Make sure a soloist has it.

If it's just one of those so-so strads with a pleasant sound, decent condition, but not particularly noteworthy or desireable, keep it and let the kids learn on it (as I'm sure it's still better than most violins with which most students come to school).

Just my 2 cents.

Preston

I actually used to take from Dr. David Margetts and from what I've heard, he was just relieved they knew where it was.