Rebounding from Subpar Performances
December 12, 2011 at 5:26 PM
“Music making is a never ceasing process of change and progress. One never arrives at the perfect performance but nevertheless draws increasing knowledge and insight and enthusiasm from every moment.”
We musicians may dream of playing brilliantly at every show, but, in reality, things don’t always go as well as we’d like.
Especially for students and amateurs, performing can come with unwelcome surprises: shakiness, memory slips, music wafting off the stand – you name it!
How can we learn from on-stage disappointments and bounce back stronger than before?
More than anything else, we develop resiliency by being able to evaluate our work objectively and devise solutions for problems. Then, with action plans in hand, we can head to the practice room empowered to progress.
Conversely, if we can’t grasp why things went wrong and see what to do about them, we tend to feel helpless.
In my teaching, I use the following tool to help rising musicians transform performance problems into artistic insights. I hope that V.com readers will find it beneficial.
Performance Evaluation Tool
The Challenges of Objective Self-Evaluation
Psychologists Mitchell Robin and Rochelle Balter wrote, “One of the most difficult lessons that we must learn as humans is how to rate our behaviors and features without globally rating ourselves.” (Performance Anxiety, p. 179).
Although it’s challenging to size up our work objectively and not put ourselves down when we miss the mark, by acquiring the skills to do so, we gain the means to overcome performance problems and grow our artistry without end.
See p. 203 of my book The Musician’s Way for an example of a self-evaluation done by a student who used the above tool; for comprehensive memorization strategies, see Chapter 4.
© 2011 Gerald Klickstein
From Tom HolzmanThis seems like a useful tool. A musician might also benefit from having a teacher or knowledgeable friends answer the questions.
Posted on December 12, 2011 at 10:06 PM
From Peter CharlesAlthough I think the points raised in this blog are useful, I would also say that evaluation after the event may be less useful than doing it during the performance.
Posted on December 19, 2011 at 8:54 AM
We should be asking ourselves why things are not going well and taking action during the performance to improve the situation.
Actual performance is the best time to learn, and one hour of performance experience is worth 200 hours of practise later when one tries to figure out the problems. Get a lot of performances in and under the belt and you can work through the problems on site.
This entry has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.
Revisit Violinist.com editor Laurie Niles' coverage from Canada of the 2013 Montreal International Musical Competition, including her interview with gold medalist Marc Bouchkov.
Gerald Klickstein is from Baltimore, Maryland. Biography
Please consider supporting Violinist.com by becoming a sponsor, and reaching our dedicated community of violin professionals, students and fans!